Analysis of Academic Performance in Professional Subjects among Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy Students at General Santos Doctors' Medical School Foundation, Incorporated, South Cotabato, Philippines: Enhancing Curriculum Delivery and Implem

This study examines the academic performance of Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy (BSPT) students at General Santos Doctors’ Medical School Foundation, Inc., with a focus on professional subjects from 2019 to 2024. Utilizing a comprehensive assessment of 28 student grades at Levels 3 and 4, the research reveals that most BSPT students received high ratings, with the majority of professional subjects categorized as "very good." In Levels 1 and 2, 11 subjects were deemed "very good," 4 "good," and 1 "satisfactory." Level 3 results indicated 5 subjects at a "very good" rating, 11 "good," and 1 "satisfactory." However, significant performance disparities were identified, particularly within 4 subjects in Level 2 and 7 subjects in Level 3, warranting attention for improvement. The findings also noted a range of consistency in student performance, with both Levels 1 and 2 displaying 12 subjects that showed no significant differences, while Level 3 revealed 8 subjects without significant variation and 7 with identified differences. These insights call for a thorough evaluation of the curriculum and instructional methodologies to enhance the delivery and implementation of professional subjects, ultimately aiming to elevate the overall academic outcomes of BSPT students and ensure they meet the standards of professional practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54792
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Academic Performance in Professional Subjects among Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy Students at General Santos Doctors' Medical School Foundation, Incorporated, South Cotabato, Philippines: Enhancing Curriculum Delivery and Implem

Analyn M. Cabatingan -, IVY KATE EMBRADURA
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

Analysis of Academic Performance in Professional Subjects among Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy Students at General Santos Doctors' Medical School Foundation, Incorporated, South Cotabato, Philippines: Enhancing Curriculum Delivery and Implem

Analyn M. Cabatingan -, IVY KATE EMBRADURA
article en

Abstract

This study examines the academic performance of Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy (BSPT) students at General Santos Doctors’ Medical School Foundation, Inc., with a focus on professional subjects from 2019 to 2024. Utilizing a comprehensive assessment of 28 student grades at Levels 3 and 4, the research reveals that most BSPT students received high ratings, with the majority of professional subjects categorized as "very good." In Levels 1 and 2, 11 subjects were deemed "very good," 4 "good," and 1 "satisfactory." Level 3 results indicated 5 subjects at a "very good" rating, 11 "good," and 1 "satisfactory." However, significant performance disparities were identified, particularly within 4 subjects in Level 2 and 7 subjects in Level 3, warranting attention for improvement. The findings also noted a range of consistency in student performance, with both Levels 1 and 2 displaying 12 subjects that showed no significant differences, while Level 3 revealed 8 subjects without significant variation and 7 with identified differences. These insights call for a thorough evaluation of the curriculum and instructional methodologies to enhance the delivery and implementation of professional subjects, ultimately aiming to elevate the overall academic outcomes of BSPT students and ensure they meet the standards of professional practice.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.