Grammaticalization between Parallel Reduction and Meaning First

Grammaticalization is generally regarded as a cross-linguistically homogeneous phenomenon. The present paper takes as its starting point the two classical perspectives of Meillet and Gabelentz, which can be associated with the two more recent hypotheses of Parallel Reduction (coevolution of meaning and form) and Meaning First, respectively. It will be shown that both hypotheses have their limitations. At the same time, both of them provide a good basis for showing how there is no homogeneity but rather cross-linguistic variation in the properties of grammaticalization outcomes. In the case of Parallel Reduction, a quantitative analysis based on eight parameters shows that the parameters do not covary equally, while data from East and mainland Southeast Asian languages show that Meaning First holds in principle, although pragmatic inference remains relevant even in the context of inflectional categories such as aspect or reference (definiteness, indefiniteness).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histoire Épistémologie Langage
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/14jz0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistic research and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grammaticalization between Parallel Reduction and Meaning First

Walter Bisang
1 citations
Histoire Épistémologie Langage
Linguistic research and analysis
10.42
article

Grammaticalization between Parallel Reduction and Meaning First

Walter Bisang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Grammaticalization is generally regarded as a cross-linguistically homogeneous phenomenon. The present paper takes as its starting point the two classical perspectives of Meillet and Gabelentz, which can be associated with the two more recent hypotheses of Parallel Reduction (coevolution of meaning and form) and Meaning First, respectively. It will be shown that both hypotheses have their limitations. At the same time, both of them provide a good basis for showing how there is no homogeneity but rather cross-linguistic variation in the properties of grammaticalization outcomes. In the case of Parallel Reduction, a quantitative analysis based on eight parameters shows that the parameters do not covary equally, while data from East and mainland Southeast Asian languages show that Meaning First holds in principle, although pragmatic inference remains relevant even in the context of inflectional categories such as aspect or reference (definiteness, indefiniteness).

Histoire Épistémologie LangageVol. 47-1
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Linguistic research and analysis
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.