Efficacy of Mulligan vs. GROM in Diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis: Does GROM Excels in Pain Relief and Functional Recovery

Abstract Introduction Adhesive Capsulitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the shoulder capsule, characterized by progressive pain and restricted active and passive range of motion (ROM), predominantly affecting individuals aged 40-65. Its prevalence is 2% - 5% in the general population and rising to 20% among patients with diabetes mellitus. The condition progresses through a four-stages- painful onset, freezing, frozen, and thawing and significantly impairs activities of daily living and quality of life. The manual therapies like the Mulligan Technique and Gentle Range of Motion (GROM) exercises aim to restore mobility, and reduce pain/discomfort. However, comparative evidence in diabetic populations remains limited. This study evaluates the relative effectiveness of these two interventions in diabetic patients with Adhesive Capsulitis. Methodology A total of 40 patients (aged 45–65) with unilateral shoulder involvement and clinically confirmed ROM restriction were selected via convenience sampling and randomized into two equal groups. Group A received Mulligan Mobilization, while Group B underwent GROM Exercises. Outcomes were assessed based on pain scores and shoulder ROM (flexion, abduction, external rotation). Results Group B demonstrated GROM Exercises in which ROM improvements were statistically significant (p< 0.005) with a mean difference of 3.5 compared with Group A which is about 2.5. For shoulder flexion, Group B had a mean of 136.30 whereas 113.25 in Group A (mean difference is 23.05, p<0.005). Similarly, shoulder abduction and external rotation were significantly better in Group B, with mean differences of 19.00 and 11.80 respectively (p< 0.005). Conclusion Both interventions were effective in alleviating symptoms of Adhesive capsulitis. However, GROM exercises yielded greater improvements in pain relief, functional ability, shoulder mobility, suggesting this intervention will contribute to better functional outcomes, positively influencing activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54681
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Mulligan vs. GROM in Diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis: Does GROM Excels in Pain Relief and Functional Recovery

Srinivas Govindarajulu, L.R. Dharani, B Akash, K Chitrarasu et al.
1 links
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Efficacy of Mulligan vs. GROM in Diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis: Does GROM Excels in Pain Relief and Functional Recovery

Srinivas Govindarajulu, L.R. Dharani, B Akash, K Chitrarasu, Nivetha R. S, G Prithik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Adhesive Capsulitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the shoulder capsule, characterized by progressive pain and restricted active and passive range of motion (ROM), predominantly affecting individuals aged 40-65. Its prevalence is 2% - 5% in the general population and rising to 20% among patients with diabetes mellitus. The condition progresses through a four-stages- painful onset, freezing, frozen, and thawing and significantly impairs activities of daily living and quality of life. The manual therapies like the Mulligan Technique and Gentle Range of Motion (GROM) exercises aim to restore mobility, and reduce pain/discomfort. However, comparative evidence in diabetic populations remains limited. This study evaluates the relative effectiveness of these two interventions in diabetic patients with Adhesive Capsulitis. Methodology A total of 40 patients (aged 45–65) with unilateral shoulder involvement and clinically confirmed ROM restriction were selected via convenience sampling and randomized into two equal groups. Group A received Mulligan Mobilization, while Group B underwent GROM Exercises. Outcomes were assessed based on pain scores and shoulder ROM (flexion, abduction, external rotation). Results Group B demonstrated GROM Exercises in which ROM improvements were statistically significant (p< 0.005) with a mean difference of 3.5 compared with Group A which is about 2.5. For shoulder flexion, Group B had a mean of 136.30 whereas 113.25 in Group A (mean difference is 23.05, p<0.005). Similarly, shoulder abduction and external rotation were significantly better in Group B, with mean differences of 19.00 and 11.80 respectively (p< 0.005). Conclusion Both interventions were effective in alleviating symptoms of Adhesive capsulitis. However, GROM exercises yielded greater improvements in pain relief, functional ability, shoulder mobility, suggesting this intervention will contribute to better functional outcomes, positively influencing activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficacy of Mulligan vs. GROM in Diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis: Does GROM Excels in Pain Relief and Functional Recovery — Srinivas Govindarajulu, L.R. Dharani, et al. · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS