Evidence Based Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing: A Retrospective Case Series

Background: Wound healing is a complex biological process often significantly impaired in chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure injuries diabetic foot ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure sores (Autologous platelet concentrates-Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF), and PRF membranes-have emerged as promising effective regenerative therapies due to their high concentration of growth factors, cytokines, bioactives substances, and their ability to enhance tissue repair. Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PRP, i-PRF, and PRF membranes in the treatment of acute and chronic cutaneous wounds over a seven-year period in a Swiss regenerative medicine center. Methods: A total of 25 patients aged 22-95 years with various wound etiologies were treated with PRP, i-PRF, and/or PRF membranes. Wound size, healing time, pain (VAS score), and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Hematological analysis of platelet products was performed using the Sysmex(R) analyzer. Results: The mean healing time was 7.8 ± 9.0 weeks. Pain intensity decreased by 72% (VAS score from 5.88 to 1.63). Complete wound closure was achieved in 47.1% of cases, with a mean surface area improvement of 50%. Venous ulcers showed the most significant response (91% improvement, 82% complete healing), followed by burns and surgical wounds. Platelet concentration increased on average by a factor of 2.35 after centrifugation. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: PRP, i-PRF, and PRF membranes are effective and well-tolerated treatments for acute and chronic wounds, offering significant clinical improvement in wound closure, pain reduction, and patient satisfaction. These findings support the integration implementation of autologous plasmatherapy into personalized wound management strategies. Larger, randomized controlled trials are warranted needed to establish standardized protocols and validate long-term efficacy protocols.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular Research
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24019/jtavr.239
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence Based Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing: A Retrospective Case Series

Bernard Bioulac, Donatella Negro, Hassan Salah, Nina Hassani
2 links
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular Research
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Evidence Based Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing: A Retrospective Case Series

Bernard Bioulac, Donatella Negro, Hassan Salah, Nina Hassani
article en

Abstract

Background: Wound healing is a complex biological process often significantly impaired in chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure injuries diabetic foot ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, and pressure sores (Autologous platelet concentrates-Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF), and PRF membranes-have emerged as promising effective regenerative therapies due to their high concentration of growth factors, cytokines, bioactives substances, and their ability to enhance tissue repair. Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PRP, i-PRF, and PRF membranes in the treatment of acute and chronic cutaneous wounds over a seven-year period in a Swiss regenerative medicine center. Methods: A total of 25 patients aged 22-95 years with various wound etiologies were treated with PRP, i-PRF, and/or PRF membranes. Wound size, healing time, pain (VAS score), and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Hematological analysis of platelet products was performed using the Sysmex(R) analyzer. Results: The mean healing time was 7.8 ± 9.0 weeks. Pain intensity decreased by 72% (VAS score from 5.88 to 1.63). Complete wound closure was achieved in 47.1% of cases, with a mean surface area improvement of 50%. Venous ulcers showed the most significant response (91% improvement, 82% complete healing), followed by burns and surgical wounds. Platelet concentration increased on average by a factor of 2.35 after centrifugation. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: PRP, i-PRF, and PRF membranes are effective and well-tolerated treatments for acute and chronic wounds, offering significant clinical improvement in wound closure, pain reduction, and patient satisfaction. These findings support the integration implementation of autologous plasmatherapy into personalized wound management strategies. Larger, randomized controlled trials are warranted needed to establish standardized protocols and validate long-term efficacy protocols.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vascular ResearchVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.