Navigating Ethical Ambiguities: The AI Paradox Among Indian College Students

This research paper examines the AI paradox in Indian higher education, where a significant proportion of college students view artificial intelligence (AI) tools as ethically problematic or akin to cheating, yet continue to employ them extensively. Drawing on secondary survey data from 2023-2025, the study explores psychological and ethical factors driving this behavior, amid inadequate institutional guidance and fragmented policies. Key findings reveal that 62-75% of students perceive AI as cheating, but usage persists at 40-70%, influenced by cognitive dissonance, moral disengagement, and cultural pressures like exam-centric education. The literature review identifies a gap in India-specific analyses, while the methodology relies on thematic analysis of reports from organizations such as Deloitte India, Turnitin, UNESCO, and NITI Aayog. The analysis highlights policy fragmentation, with only 30% of universities having AI guidelines, and recommends unified ethical frameworks. This paradox underscores the need for proactive institutional reforms to align AI adoption with academic integrity, fostering a balanced educational ecosystem. Implications extend to policymakers, educators, and students, advocating for AI literacy programs to resolve ethical ambiguities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54495
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Ethical Ambiguities: The AI Paradox Among Indian College Students

Udayan Kachchhy
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Navigating Ethical Ambiguities: The AI Paradox Among Indian College Students

Udayan Kachchhy
article en

Abstract

This research paper examines the AI paradox in Indian higher education, where a significant proportion of college students view artificial intelligence (AI) tools as ethically problematic or akin to cheating, yet continue to employ them extensively. Drawing on secondary survey data from 2023-2025, the study explores psychological and ethical factors driving this behavior, amid inadequate institutional guidance and fragmented policies. Key findings reveal that 62-75% of students perceive AI as cheating, but usage persists at 40-70%, influenced by cognitive dissonance, moral disengagement, and cultural pressures like exam-centric education. The literature review identifies a gap in India-specific analyses, while the methodology relies on thematic analysis of reports from organizations such as Deloitte India, Turnitin, UNESCO, and NITI Aayog. The analysis highlights policy fragmentation, with only 30% of universities having AI guidelines, and recommends unified ethical frameworks. This paradox underscores the need for proactive institutional reforms to align AI adoption with academic integrity, fostering a balanced educational ecosystem. Implications extend to policymakers, educators, and students, advocating for AI literacy programs to resolve ethical ambiguities.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(4)
Gujarat University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Ethical Ambiguities: The AI Paradox Among Indian College Students — Udayan Kachchhy · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS