Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise

This article proposes that radical democratic theory offers a unique angle for analyzing the role of expertise in politics. Recent literature on expertise and democracy has largely focused on deliberative and institutional perspectives. In contrast, I highlight the role of disruptive, performative action in shaping how the common world is perceived and interpreted. Drawing on contemporary ecological activism, I demonstrate how expertise is employed to articulate societal antagonisms, how activists enact epistemic equality, and how they reassemble democratic publics. The article further suggests approaching the expertise/activism interface in architectonic terms, focusing on the constitution of a common symbolic space within which adversarial relationships unfold. Understood in this way, expertise is not primarily a form of rule that stands in opposition to popular self-governance, though it can assume such a technocratic form. Rather, as architecture, it facilitates democratic dissensus while remaining open to popular input and redesign.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251367639
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise

Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen
1 links
Political Studies
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise

Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen
article en

Abstract

This article proposes that radical democratic theory offers a unique angle for analyzing the role of expertise in politics. Recent literature on expertise and democracy has largely focused on deliberative and institutional perspectives. In contrast, I highlight the role of disruptive, performative action in shaping how the common world is perceived and interpreted. Drawing on contemporary ecological activism, I demonstrate how expertise is employed to articulate societal antagonisms, how activists enact epistemic equality, and how they reassemble democratic publics. The article further suggests approaching the expertise/activism interface in architectonic terms, focusing on the constitution of a common symbolic space within which adversarial relationships unfold. Understood in this way, expertise is not primarily a form of rule that stands in opposition to popular self-governance, though it can assume such a technocratic form. Rather, as architecture, it facilitates democratic dissensus while remaining open to popular input and redesign.

Political Studies
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, DePaul University, Fulbright Suomi -säätiö, Kulttuurin ja Yhteiskunnan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward a Radical Democratic Theory of Expertise — Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen · Political Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS