No rest for the stimmed: energy from caffeine or caffeine et al.?

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an energy drink vs. a caffeine-matched control on mental and physical performance.Methods Using a randomized, double-blind design (n = 62), subjects were assigned to an energy drink (Ghost®) or a caffeine-matched control (200 mg caffeine). The following assessments were conducted before and approximately 45 minutes after consuming an energy drink or caffeine-matched control: psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), CNS Tap Test, handgrip strength, and POMS.Results Table 1 shows the subject demographics. There were no significant differences between the treatment and control for any of the assessments. Both groups improved in the total mood disturbance score; in addition, treatment improved in the CNS Tap Test. However, there were no between-group differences for any of the other assessments.Conclusions Consuming the energy drink or caffeine-matched control resulted in an improvement in the total mood disturbance. In addition, consuming the energy drink significantly improved the CNS Tap Test score. However, there were no between-group differences for any of the measures. Thus, it is ostensible that any effect of an energy drink is likely due primarily to caffeine itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2025.2550146
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No rest for the stimmed: energy from caffeine or caffeine et al.?

Jason Curtis, José António, Antonella V. Schwarz, Cassandra Evans et al.
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Coffee research and impacts
article

No rest for the stimmed: energy from caffeine or caffeine et al.?

Jason Curtis, José António, Antonella V. Schwarz, Cassandra Evans, Ana Jiménez Ubieto, Tehani Zambrano Castro, Flavia Pereira, Juan Carlos Santana, Elisabetta Esposito, Hena Thakkar, Alyana Andal, Antonio Crisanti, Gavin Poulshock
article en

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an energy drink vs. a caffeine-matched control on mental and physical performance.Methods Using a randomized, double-blind design (n = 62), subjects were assigned to an energy drink (Ghost®) or a caffeine-matched control (200 mg caffeine). The following assessments were conducted before and approximately 45 minutes after consuming an energy drink or caffeine-matched control: psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), CNS Tap Test, handgrip strength, and POMS.Results Table 1 shows the subject demographics. There were no significant differences between the treatment and control for any of the assessments. Both groups improved in the total mood disturbance score; in addition, treatment improved in the CNS Tap Test. However, there were no between-group differences for any of the other assessments.Conclusions Consuming the energy drink or caffeine-matched control resulted in an improvement in the total mood disturbance. In addition, consuming the energy drink significantly improved the CNS Tap Test score. However, there were no between-group differences for any of the measures. Thus, it is ostensible that any effect of an energy drink is likely due primarily to caffeine itself.

Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionVol. 22(sup2)
Barry University (US), Nova Southeastern University (US), Concordia University (CA), Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.