Environmental Impacts of Lithium Brines Across the World: Brine Quality, Technology Choices and Regional Disparities
Lithium (Li), a critical mineral for the global clean energy transition, has experienced surging demand due to the widespread use of Li-ion batteries. Brine extraction has emerged as the dominant supply pathway, drawing increasing scrutiny over its environmental impacts. However, most studies are limited to single-site analyses, and a global, system-level understanding remains scarce. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) of Li carbonate equivalent (LCE) production from 11 representative brine operations worldwide, using site-specific inventory data. Key findings include: (1) among 11 brines, Atacama has the lowest impacts (GWP: 3.30 t CO2-equiv/t LCE) due to high Li grade and extensive solar use, whereas Cauchari-Olaroz and Qarhan show category-specific highs, reflecting the influence of brine quality and extraction technology. (2) Regionally, Chile shows the lowest GWP and water consumption (WCP: 58.04 m3/t LCE), Argentina the highest GWP (16.28 t CO2-equiv/t LCE), and the U.S. the highest WCP (496.53 m3/t LCE) from low-grade brines. In China, cleaner electricity and advanced technologies reduce impacts, though low brine quality offsets some benefits (GWP: 11.11 t CO2-equiv/t LCE; WCP: 163.55 m3/t LCE). (3) Among technologies, natural evaporation achieves the lowest GWP through solar-driven, low-energy processing, while electrolysis has the highest GWP (14.93 t CO2-equiv/t LCE) and adsorption–membrane coupling the highest WCP (617.1 m3/t LCE). (4) Sensitivity analysis reveals that steam use has the greatest impact on GWP (up to 7.7%), while soda ash and freshwater dominate WCP sensitivity (up to 8.7%). These findings can offer insights to the sustainable sourcing and environmental impacts mitigation of Li extraction at the global scale.
Authors
- Peng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1145-9605)
- Ze Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-7793)
- Xin Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-8623)
- Yan Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4282-8418)
- Danyi Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-8063)
- Wen Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-5042)
Institutions
- Tianjin University (CN)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CN)
- Institute of Urban Environment (CN)
- New York State University College of Human Ecology (US)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Published
- 2025-08-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c03739
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Extraction and Separation Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.14
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- State Grid Corporation of China