The global role of bioassessment in policy delivery and decision-making for inland waters

Bioassessment is necessary to guide the management of freshwater ecosystems and promote sustainable water use. However, many countries either do not have nationally-approved bioassessment systems, or their bioassessment results are not used in water policy decision-making. Despite the importance and urgency of the topic, a global overview of bioassessment and its use in decision-making is missing. In this study, we analyzed survey responses from 341 bioassessment practitioners from 109 countries to examine the role bioassessment plays in freshwater governance. Two thirds of respondents reported that bioassessment was used in their country, with the strength of the link to legislation increasing with per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Bioassessment data generally fulfilled several roles, including following trends over time and developing catchment plans, both significantly linked to increased per capita GDP. Strong relationships with stressors were cited as a strength of bioassessment over other forms of evidence gathering, whilst costs and shortage of trained staff were the most common weaknesses. Governance is key, being the main factor explaining why some countries don't have bioassessment and enabling its enaction through legislation in others. Initiatives therefore need to focus on creating an "enabling environment" as well as financial and technical aspects. We found synergies between having international agreements and using bioassessment for communication when delivering nationally important roles for bioassessment. By identifying key drivers for using bioassessment in decision making, our study provides recommendations to inform future research, policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127099
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The global role of bioassessment in policy delivery and decision-making for inland waters

Fábio de Oliveira Roque, Andreas Bruder, Martyn Kelly, John P. Simaika et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Coastal and Marine Management
article

The global role of bioassessment in policy delivery and decision-making for inland waters

Fábio de Oliveira Roque, Andreas Bruder, Martyn Kelly, John P. Simaika, James B. Stribling, Craig R. Macadam, Jennifer Lento, Stuart Warner, Sandra Poikāne, Marcelo S. Moretti, Tor Erik Eriksen, Kristian Meissner, Gary Free, Dave Penrose, Alejandra Correa-Bedoya
article en

Abstract

Bioassessment is necessary to guide the management of freshwater ecosystems and promote sustainable water use. However, many countries either do not have nationally-approved bioassessment systems, or their bioassessment results are not used in water policy decision-making. Despite the importance and urgency of the topic, a global overview of bioassessment and its use in decision-making is missing. In this study, we analyzed survey responses from 341 bioassessment practitioners from 109 countries to examine the role bioassessment plays in freshwater governance. Two thirds of respondents reported that bioassessment was used in their country, with the strength of the link to legislation increasing with per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Bioassessment data generally fulfilled several roles, including following trends over time and developing catchment plans, both significantly linked to increased per capita GDP. Strong relationships with stressors were cited as a strength of bioassessment over other forms of evidence gathering, whilst costs and shortage of trained staff were the most common weaknesses. Governance is key, being the main factor explaining why some countries don't have bioassessment and enabling its enaction through legislation in others. Initiatives therefore need to focus on creating an "enabling environment" as well as financial and technical aspects. We found synergies between having international agreements and using bioassessment for communication when delivering nationally important roles for bioassessment. By identifying key drivers for using bioassessment in decision making, our study provides recommendations to inform future research, policy and practice.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 393
University of New Brunswick (CA), University of Stirling (GB), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), United Nations Environment Programme (KE), European Commission (BE), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), Bumblebee Conservation Trust (GB), Joint Research Centre (IT), Universidade Vila Velha (BR), International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (LK), University of North Carolina at Asheville (US), Tetra Tech (United States) (US)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, Joint Research Centre
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.