Computer assisted history taking in elective and acute care: Systematic review

• CAHT shows high completion rates in both elective and acute care settings • Patients report high satisfaction with CAHT usability and experience • CAHT contributes to patient communication and active patient involvement • Studies show high data completeness and diagnostic alignment • Workflow efficiency varies, depending on EHR integration and setting Computer-assisted history taking (CAHT) could increase patient flow efficiency and healthcare resources optimization. By assessing reported clinical and patient-reported outcomes, we can clarify the benefits, limitations, and practical considerations of CAHT in clinical care. This systematic review synthesizes literature on CAHT in acute and elective care. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed study quality, and extracted data narratively. In total, 19 studies (involving 11885 unique patients and 151 healthcare providers) were included. CAHT-questionnaire completion rates were high (75–95%) in larger samples but lower (51–67%) in smaller ones. Satisfaction was consistently high across different delivery methods and devices. Positive outcomes on patient engagement, such as active involvement and enhanced communication, were demonstrated. Clinical efficiency did improve in terms of streamlined workflows and resource utilization. Mixed results were reported on consultation duration. Finally, improved diagnostic accuracy was reported through comprehensive data capture and better alignment with clinical standards. CAHT offers opportunities to contribute to patient engagement, workflows, and diagnostic accuracy, with high completion rates. We need sound implementation studies to explore how CAHT-systems can streamline processes and minimize needed resources. Future implementations should ensure integration into electronic health records and address digital inclusion across age groups and regions to realize CAHT’s potential in routine, patient-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Technology
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer assisted history taking in elective and acute care: Systematic review

Thomas Timmers, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Walter van der Weegen, Casper Craamer
1 citations
Health Policy and Technology
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
article

Computer assisted history taking in elective and acute care: Systematic review

Thomas Timmers, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Walter van der Weegen, Casper Craamer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• CAHT shows high completion rates in both elective and acute care settings • Patients report high satisfaction with CAHT usability and experience • CAHT contributes to patient communication and active patient involvement • Studies show high data completeness and diagnostic alignment • Workflow efficiency varies, depending on EHR integration and setting Computer-assisted history taking (CAHT) could increase patient flow efficiency and healthcare resources optimization. By assessing reported clinical and patient-reported outcomes, we can clarify the benefits, limitations, and practical considerations of CAHT in clinical care. This systematic review synthesizes literature on CAHT in acute and elective care. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed study quality, and extracted data narratively. In total, 19 studies (involving 11885 unique patients and 151 healthcare providers) were included. CAHT-questionnaire completion rates were high (75–95%) in larger samples but lower (51–67%) in smaller ones. Satisfaction was consistently high across different delivery methods and devices. Positive outcomes on patient engagement, such as active involvement and enhanced communication, were demonstrated. Clinical efficiency did improve in terms of streamlined workflows and resource utilization. Mixed results were reported on consultation duration. Finally, improved diagnostic accuracy was reported through comprehensive data capture and better alignment with clinical standards. CAHT offers opportunities to contribute to patient engagement, workflows, and diagnostic accuracy, with high completion rates. We need sound implementation studies to explore how CAHT-systems can streamline processes and minimize needed resources. Future implementations should ensure integration into electronic health records and address digital inclusion across age groups and regions to realize CAHT’s potential in routine, patient-centered care.

Health Policy and TechnologyVol. 14(6)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Interactive Research and Development (PK), St. Anna Ziekenhuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.