Geometric nonlinear shape sensing using the calibration matrix method

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is increasingly being considered for predictive maintenance of aircrafts. This study investigates the use of strain and displacement measurements obtained from a limited number of sensors as input to a calibration matrix (CM) algorithm to compute the shapes of structures undergoing geometric nonlinear (GNL) structural deformation. To evaluate CM, GNL benchmark problems from the literature were expanded with sensors at specific locations on these structures. Two problems used for GNL inverse finite element methods (iFEM) in the literature were implemented as well, for comparison. Each problem was modeled using ABAQUS and subjected to significant deformations, resulting in strain and displacement measurements from simulated sensors. A novel GNL CM variant is presented that converts virtual sensor data into accurately reconstructed strain/displacement distributions and applied loads, achieving superior accuracy for the two state-of-the-art GNL iFEM problems. The accuracy was assessed for each problem based on the number and type of sensors employed. Under noiseless conditions, the presented method achieves a force reconstruction error of 1% or less for all problems utilizing 96 strain sensors and of 2% or less for all but one problem when employing 96 displacement sensors or a combination of strain and displacement sensors. A displacement error of 0.34% or less is achieved for all benchmark problems, using just 32 sensors of either type. When subjected to noise, the accuracy is comparable or better than the iFEM results with 96 sensors of either type for all but one of the benchmark problems, and superior when using a greater number of sensors, reaching median errors of less than 1%. A median force error of 2.5% is reached with 720 strain sensors when subject to 10% noise. This level of accuracy is achieved for both isotropic and composite laminate materials, and for structures undergoing buckling deformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247261476532
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geometric nonlinear shape sensing using the calibration matrix method

Marcias Martinez, Cornelis de Mooij
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
article

Geometric nonlinear shape sensing using the calibration matrix method

Marcias Martinez, Cornelis de Mooij
article en

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is increasingly being considered for predictive maintenance of aircrafts. This study investigates the use of strain and displacement measurements obtained from a limited number of sensors as input to a calibration matrix (CM) algorithm to compute the shapes of structures undergoing geometric nonlinear (GNL) structural deformation. To evaluate CM, GNL benchmark problems from the literature were expanded with sensors at specific locations on these structures. Two problems used for GNL inverse finite element methods (iFEM) in the literature were implemented as well, for comparison. Each problem was modeled using ABAQUS and subjected to significant deformations, resulting in strain and displacement measurements from simulated sensors. A novel GNL CM variant is presented that converts virtual sensor data into accurately reconstructed strain/displacement distributions and applied loads, achieving superior accuracy for the two state-of-the-art GNL iFEM problems. The accuracy was assessed for each problem based on the number and type of sensors employed. Under noiseless conditions, the presented method achieves a force reconstruction error of 1% or less for all problems utilizing 96 strain sensors and of 2% or less for all but one problem when employing 96 displacement sensors or a combination of strain and displacement sensors. A displacement error of 0.34% or less is achieved for all benchmark problems, using just 32 sensors of either type. When subjected to noise, the accuracy is comparable or better than the iFEM results with 96 sensors of either type for all but one of the benchmark problems, and superior when using a greater number of sensors, reaching median errors of less than 1%. A median force error of 2.5% is reached with 720 strain sensors when subject to 10% noise. This level of accuracy is achieved for both isotropic and composite laminate materials, and for structures undergoing buckling deformation.

The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.