Navigating geometric thought: A classroom-based intervention using discovery-contextual strategies aligned with van Hiele’s cognitive framework

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the enhancement of students’ geometric thinking through the integration of Discovery–Contextual learning strategies with van Hiele’s levels of reasoning. In addition, it examines the contribution of logical–mathematical intelligence to mathematics learning outcomes by synthesizing findings from prior research. Method: The research employed a classroom action research design implemented in three iterative cycles involving 13 fifth-semester mathematics education students. Data were collected through geometry thinking tests, observation notes, and the van Hiele-based assessment tool, then analyzed descriptively to track cognitive development across cycles. Complementing this, a meta-analysis of 41 empirical studies was conducted using a random-effects model to evaluate the consistency of logical–mathematical intelligence on students’ mathematics achievement. Findings: The results indicate steady improvement in students’ geometric reasoning, particularly at the deduction and rigor levels, with mean performance rising from 78.4% in the first cycle to 92.8% in the third. Reflection across cycles also revealed stronger engagement, reflective thinking, and collaborative learning. The meta-analysis further confirmed that logical–mathematical intelligence consistently exerts a strong and stable influence on mathematical performance across different educational stages and contexts. Significance: Findings highlight the pedagogical value of combining Discovery–Contextual learning with van Hiele’s framework to cultivate higher-order geometric thinking. At the same time, the evidence underscores the necessity of integrating logical reasoning into curriculum design and instructional strategies. Together, these contributions provide both theoretical insights and practical guidance for advancing mathematics education, especially in preparing prospective teachers to meet diverse cognitive needs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Jabar Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i2.27845
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating geometric thought: A classroom-based intervention using discovery-contextual strategies aligned with van Hiele’s cognitive framework

Jefri Marzal, Nofyta Arlianti, Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan, Kamid Kamid
1 citations
Al-Jabar Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
8.93
article

Navigating geometric thought: A classroom-based intervention using discovery-contextual strategies aligned with van Hiele’s cognitive framework

Jefri Marzal, Nofyta Arlianti, Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan, Kamid Kamid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the enhancement of students’ geometric thinking through the integration of Discovery–Contextual learning strategies with van Hiele’s levels of reasoning. In addition, it examines the contribution of logical–mathematical intelligence to mathematics learning outcomes by synthesizing findings from prior research. Method: The research employed a classroom action research design implemented in three iterative cycles involving 13 fifth-semester mathematics education students. Data were collected through geometry thinking tests, observation notes, and the van Hiele-based assessment tool, then analyzed descriptively to track cognitive development across cycles. Complementing this, a meta-analysis of 41 empirical studies was conducted using a random-effects model to evaluate the consistency of logical–mathematical intelligence on students’ mathematics achievement. Findings: The results indicate steady improvement in students’ geometric reasoning, particularly at the deduction and rigor levels, with mean performance rising from 78.4% in the first cycle to 92.8% in the third. Reflection across cycles also revealed stronger engagement, reflective thinking, and collaborative learning. The meta-analysis further confirmed that logical–mathematical intelligence consistently exerts a strong and stable influence on mathematical performance across different educational stages and contexts. Significance: Findings highlight the pedagogical value of combining Discovery–Contextual learning with van Hiele’s framework to cultivate higher-order geometric thinking. At the same time, the evidence underscores the necessity of integrating logical reasoning into curriculum design and instructional strategies. Together, these contributions provide both theoretical insights and practical guidance for advancing mathematics education, especially in preparing prospective teachers to meet diverse cognitive needs.

Al-Jabar Jurnal Pendidikan MatematikaVol. 16(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.