Nomadism in a Becoming-Labyrinth in Pynchon’s <i>The Crying of Lot 49</i>

Thomas Pynchon’s novel The Crying of Lot 49 constructs a wholly new “Becoming-Labyrinth” narrative via the tangled underground postal system known as Tristero. Unlike the linear structure of a traditional labyrinth, in which a hero is guided to a central truth, Pynchon’s Becoming-Labyrinth thrives on rupture, drift, and uncertainty. The protagonist Oedipa Maas continually wanders nomadically through fragmented clues and decentered spaces, embodying the modern individual’s existential plight adrift between discourses of power and illusions of truth. Grounded in Deleuze and Guattari’s theories of rhizomes, deterritorialization, nomadism, and becoming, this paper examines how Oedipa navigates an ever-expanding network of meaning within the Becoming-Labyrinth, revealing how Pynchon’s rhizomatic writing resists the grand narratives and rationalist centers of modernity. In the end, the novel denies any possibility of reaching a final truth and instead points toward an endless process of meaning-generation, thereby constructing a pluralistic, open, and politically resistant postmodern aesthetic paradigm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanities and Arts Perspectives
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70731/axamnf16
Primary Topic
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nomadism in a Becoming-Labyrinth in Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49

S. H. Yang, Yike Chen, Zhaoyan Li
1 links
Journal of Humanities and Arts Perspectives
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
article

Nomadism in a Becoming-Labyrinth in Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49

S. H. Yang, Yike Chen, Zhaoyan Li
article en

Abstract

Thomas Pynchon’s novel The Crying of Lot 49 constructs a wholly new “Becoming-Labyrinth” narrative via the tangled underground postal system known as Tristero. Unlike the linear structure of a traditional labyrinth, in which a hero is guided to a central truth, Pynchon’s Becoming-Labyrinth thrives on rupture, drift, and uncertainty. The protagonist Oedipa Maas continually wanders nomadically through fragmented clues and decentered spaces, embodying the modern individual’s existential plight adrift between discourses of power and illusions of truth. Grounded in Deleuze and Guattari’s theories of rhizomes, deterritorialization, nomadism, and becoming, this paper examines how Oedipa navigates an ever-expanding network of meaning within the Becoming-Labyrinth, revealing how Pynchon’s rhizomatic writing resists the grand narratives and rationalist centers of modernity. In the end, the novel denies any possibility of reaching a final truth and instead points toward an endless process of meaning-generation, thereby constructing a pluralistic, open, and politically resistant postmodern aesthetic paradigm.

Journal of Humanities and Arts PerspectivesVol. 1(2)
Yonsei University (KR), Northwest University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Contemporary Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.