Evaluation of lingual split technique vs. Buccal guttering in extraction of lingually placed impacted mandibular third molar: A comparative study

The study concluded that lingual split technique using chisel and mallet is found to be better than the buccal guttering approach technique using rotary instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_61_23
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of lingual split technique vs. Buccal guttering in extraction of lingually placed impacted mandibular third molar: A comparative study

Amiya Agrawal, Vibha Singh, Reading Well Kharmawlong, Shadab Mohammad et al.
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Evaluation of lingual split technique vs. Buccal guttering in extraction of lingually placed impacted mandibular third molar: A comparative study

Amiya Agrawal, Vibha Singh, Reading Well Kharmawlong, Shadab Mohammad, Geeta Singh, Hari Ram
article en

Abstract

The study concluded that lingual split technique using chisel and mallet is found to be better than the buccal guttering approach technique using rotary instruments.

National Journal of Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 16(2)
King George's Medical University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.