Code-Talker Paradox: Machine Learning Algorithms with Differential Privacy to Classify Heart Failure Patients

The Code-Talker Paradox concept is applied to test the ability to achieve differential privacy while maintaining an acceptable level of machine learning accuracy. A real-world dataset for heart failure patients is used to test the accuracy. Four different machine learning algorithms, namely: decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, and Naïve Bayes, are employed. Laplace noise is added to the raw dataset to protect private and sensitive user data. This research aims to: first, find a balanced noise scale where differential privacy is achievable with an acceptable accuracy result. Second, evaluate the four machine learning classifiers and introduce the one that best fits the current heart failure dataset. Hyperparameter tunings have been applied to the employed algorithms. Different levels and scenarios are tested with the Laplace noise scale and added to the raw data. The accuracy results are recorded and compared. Laplace noise between 1 and 4 does not affect accuracy, while 5 to 7 results in regularization and increases the accuracy accordingly. A Laplace noise value of 28 and above significantly reduces the accuracy value. Finally, the decision tree shows the more stable algorithm regarding the added noise. While logistic regression is the more fluctuating algorithm, it still presents the highest accuracy. Potential future research and study limitations are discussed in order to contribute to a more comprehensive study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iraqi Journal of Science
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2025.66.8.33
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Code-Talker Paradox: Machine Learning Algorithms with Differential Privacy to Classify Heart Failure Patients

Samer Alaa Hussein, Shakir Mahmood Mahdi, Idrees A. Zahid
Iraqi Journal of Science
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Code-Talker Paradox: Machine Learning Algorithms with Differential Privacy to Classify Heart Failure Patients

Samer Alaa Hussein, Shakir Mahmood Mahdi, Idrees A. Zahid
article en

Abstract

The Code-Talker Paradox concept is applied to test the ability to achieve differential privacy while maintaining an acceptable level of machine learning accuracy. A real-world dataset for heart failure patients is used to test the accuracy. Four different machine learning algorithms, namely: decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, and Naïve Bayes, are employed. Laplace noise is added to the raw dataset to protect private and sensitive user data. This research aims to: first, find a balanced noise scale where differential privacy is achievable with an acceptable accuracy result. Second, evaluate the four machine learning classifiers and introduce the one that best fits the current heart failure dataset. Hyperparameter tunings have been applied to the employed algorithms. Different levels and scenarios are tested with the Laplace noise scale and added to the raw data. The accuracy results are recorded and compared. Laplace noise between 1 and 4 does not affect accuracy, while 5 to 7 results in regularization and increases the accuracy accordingly. A Laplace noise value of 28 and above significantly reduces the accuracy value. Finally, the decision tree shows the more stable algorithm regarding the added noise. While logistic regression is the more fluctuating algorithm, it still presents the highest accuracy. Potential future research and study limitations are discussed in order to contribute to a more comprehensive study.

Iraqi Journal of Science
University of Technology - Iraq (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.