Decarbonising the UK pulp, paper and printing sector: Balancing sustainability and global competitiveness through insights from LMDI and MRIO analysis

The United Kingdom's pulp, paper, and printing sector (UKPPP) contributes ~6 % of the nation's industrial CO 2 emissions. While these emissions have declined since 2000, mainly because roughly half its paper mills closed due to global competitiveness challenges, other factors influencing emission dynamics (e.g., carbon intensity, energy intensity, fossil fuel dependency, economic structure, and activities) remain quantitatively unevaluated in comparison to other top global PPP countries (TGPPP). Additionally, the UKPPP relies on imports from TGPPP. Yet, a comprehensive modelling of the ecological CO 2 emission exchanges and a comparison of sectoral production structures and emission dynamics between these entities have not been conducted. This analytical gap hinders the gauging of the effectiveness of decarbonisation plans, impacting wider UK climate policy. Consequently, this paper employs a two-step, top-down modelling approach, utilising logarithmic mean divisia index and environmentally-extended multi-region input-output frameworks to examine the sectoral emission driving factors between 2000 and 2019. The analysis reveals that across the aggregate 20-year period, efficiency gains from improved energy intensity contributed minimally to emission mitigation, despite overall improvements in carbon intensity and reduced fossil fuel dependency, primarily induced by an increased proportion of solid biomass and biogas. Importantly, despite the UKPPP's improved carbon intensity, CO 2 emissions are effectively leaking to other TGPPP, with the exception of Russia, highlighting a critical need to rethink current bilateral trading mechanisms. Macro-level sector-specific strategies encompassing new circular business models, supply-chain re-configurations, and consumption-based carbon budgeting to both decarbonise the UKPPP and keep it globally competitive are proposed. • Identifies emission-driving factors of the UK vs top global pulp, paper and printing sector • Highlights UK'S 66 % drop in emissions but inefficiencies in energy use persist • UKPPP's emissions reduction is not driven by efficiency gains but by structural changes. • UKPPP leaks emissions to TGPPP, except Russia, indicating carbon leakage. • Policy shift to supply-chain reconfiguration, energy efficiency, renewable integration is needed to remain competitive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108872
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decarbonising the UK pulp, paper and printing sector: Balancing sustainability and global competitiveness through insights from LMDI and MRIO analysis

Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Hidemichi Fujii, Adolf Akwei Acquaye, André Cabrera Serrenho et al.
2 citations
Energy Economics
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
article

Decarbonising the UK pulp, paper and printing sector: Balancing sustainability and global competitiveness through insights from LMDI and MRIO analysis

Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Hidemichi Fujii, Adolf Akwei Acquaye, André Cabrera Serrenho, Taofeeq Ibn‐Mohammed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The United Kingdom's pulp, paper, and printing sector (UKPPP) contributes ~6 % of the nation's industrial CO 2 emissions. While these emissions have declined since 2000, mainly because roughly half its paper mills closed due to global competitiveness challenges, other factors influencing emission dynamics (e.g., carbon intensity, energy intensity, fossil fuel dependency, economic structure, and activities) remain quantitatively unevaluated in comparison to other top global PPP countries (TGPPP). Additionally, the UKPPP relies on imports from TGPPP. Yet, a comprehensive modelling of the ecological CO 2 emission exchanges and a comparison of sectoral production structures and emission dynamics between these entities have not been conducted. This analytical gap hinders the gauging of the effectiveness of decarbonisation plans, impacting wider UK climate policy. Consequently, this paper employs a two-step, top-down modelling approach, utilising logarithmic mean divisia index and environmentally-extended multi-region input-output frameworks to examine the sectoral emission driving factors between 2000 and 2019. The analysis reveals that across the aggregate 20-year period, efficiency gains from improved energy intensity contributed minimally to emission mitigation, despite overall improvements in carbon intensity and reduced fossil fuel dependency, primarily induced by an increased proportion of solid biomass and biogas. Importantly, despite the UKPPP's improved carbon intensity, CO 2 emissions are effectively leaking to other TGPPP, with the exception of Russia, highlighting a critical need to rethink current bilateral trading mechanisms. Macro-level sector-specific strategies encompassing new circular business models, supply-chain re-configurations, and consumption-based carbon budgeting to both decarbonise the UKPPP and keep it globally competitive are proposed. • Identifies emission-driving factors of the UK vs top global pulp, paper and printing sector • Highlights UK'S 66 % drop in emissions but inefficiencies in energy use persist • UKPPP's emissions reduction is not driven by efficiency gains but by structural changes. • UKPPP leaks emissions to TGPPP, except Russia, indicating carbon leakage. • Policy shift to supply-chain reconfiguration, energy efficiency, renewable integration is needed to remain competitive.

Energy EconomicsVol. 150
Edith Cowan University (AU), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of Cambridge (GB), North-West University (ZA), University of Warwick (GB), Institute for Sustainability (GB), Nagasaki University (JP)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.