Studying Development of Psychopathology Using Changing Measures to Account for Heterotypic Continuity

Objective: Psychopathology shows changes in behavioral manifestation across development, i.e., heterotypic continuity. However, research has paid little attention to how to account for heterotypic continuity when examining development of psychopathology. This longitudinal study accounted for heterotypic continuity of multiple psychopathology dimensions by using developmental scaling to place multi-informant ratings of children’s behavior problems onto the same scale to chart children’s trajectories.Method: The study examined children’s (N=231) development of three psychopathology dimensions—externalizing, internalizing, and thought-disordered—using different measures across seven timepoints from 3–7.5 years of age. Psychopathology dimensions were assessed by mother-, father-, and teacher/caregiver-report. We compared three assessment approaches: the common items, upward/downward extension, and construct-valid items approaches. We compared two scoring approaches: mean scoring and developmental scaling. Developmental scaling aims to place scores from age-differing measures onto the same scale. We compared their accuracy, for externalizing problems, in terms of criterion validity with respect to observations of compliance and attention to task.Results: Using different measures across ages (i.e., construct-valid items approach) was the most accurate assessment approach—modestly more accurate than using the common items or upward/downward extension—in terms of criterion validity with respect to observations of compliance and attention to task (rdiff=.07–.13). Developmental scaling was the most accurate scoring approach—modestly more accurate than average scores (rdiff=.03–.17).Conclusion: Using (a) age-differing measures to account for heterotypic continuity and (b) developmental scaling to link scores from the different measures onto the same scale may enable studying development of psychopathology across the lifespan.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p4kgw_v3
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying Development of Psychopathology Using Changing Measures to Account for Heterotypic Continuity

Jacob Oleson, Isaac T. Petersen, Won-Chan Lee, Zachary Demko
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Studying Development of Psychopathology Using Changing Measures to Account for Heterotypic Continuity

Jacob Oleson, Isaac T. Petersen, Won-Chan Lee, Zachary Demko
article en

Abstract

Objective: Psychopathology shows changes in behavioral manifestation across development, i.e., heterotypic continuity. However, research has paid little attention to how to account for heterotypic continuity when examining development of psychopathology. This longitudinal study accounted for heterotypic continuity of multiple psychopathology dimensions by using developmental scaling to place multi-informant ratings of children’s behavior problems onto the same scale to chart children’s trajectories.Method: The study examined children’s (N=231) development of three psychopathology dimensions—externalizing, internalizing, and thought-disordered—using different measures across seven timepoints from 3–7.5 years of age. Psychopathology dimensions were assessed by mother-, father-, and teacher/caregiver-report. We compared three assessment approaches: the common items, upward/downward extension, and construct-valid items approaches. We compared two scoring approaches: mean scoring and developmental scaling. Developmental scaling aims to place scores from age-differing measures onto the same scale. We compared their accuracy, for externalizing problems, in terms of criterion validity with respect to observations of compliance and attention to task.Results: Using different measures across ages (i.e., construct-valid items approach) was the most accurate assessment approach—modestly more accurate than using the common items or upward/downward extension—in terms of criterion validity with respect to observations of compliance and attention to task (rdiff=.07–.13). Developmental scaling was the most accurate scoring approach—modestly more accurate than average scores (rdiff=.03–.17).Conclusion: Using (a) age-differing measures to account for heterotypic continuity and (b) developmental scaling to link scores from the different measures onto the same scale may enable studying development of psychopathology across the lifespan.

National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studying Development of Psychopathology Using Changing Measures to Account for Heterotypic Continuity — Jacob Oleson, Isaac T. Petersen, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS