Comparative carbon footprint analysis of semi-digital and fully digital implant-supported prosthesis fabrication processes

• Carbon intensity of implant impression ranges from 31.8 to 35.0 kgCO 2 eq per unit. • A major source of emissions was electricity consumption for steam sterilization. • Hybrid ceramic block method shows higher emission costs compared to zirconia disk. • Fully digital process using a zirconia disc is recommended for sustainable dental practice. Amid growing climate concerns, dental practices have emerged as notable contributors to carbon emissions, particularly with the increasing of integrated digital technology. This study aims to evaluate the environemtnal and economic impacts of four different implant-supported prosthesis fabrication workflows. Data on resource and energy consumption were collected from two types of fabrication processes: semi-digital and fully digital, using either zirconia discs or hybrid ceramic blocks. The results revealed that: (1) the semi-digital process with a zirconia disc emitted 35.1 kgCO₂eq per unit, (2) the semi-digital process with a hybrid ceramic block emitted 32.8 kgCO₂eq per unit, (3) the fully digital process with a zirconia disc emitted 34.5 kgCO₂eq per unit, (4) the fully digital process with a hybrid ceramic block emitted 31.8 kgCO₂eq per unit, and (5) the major hotspots of emissions were electricity consumption for steam sterilization of dental equipment and the sintering furnace used in crown fabrication. Considering both environmental and economic aspects, the fully digital implant impression process using a zirconia disc offered the better balance of sustainability. It offers the lowest amount of production cost (26.0 USD/unit) and net emission cost (0.75 USD/kgCO₂eq) compared to other processes. These findings provide valuable insights for patients and healthcare policymakers in selecting an environmentally friendly implant impression process. Additionally, the integration of digital dentistry and strategic material selection should be prioritized in the development of future clinical guidelines and sustainability-oriented dental policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101294
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative carbon footprint analysis of semi-digital and fully digital implant-supported prosthesis fabrication processes

Withida Patthanaissaranukool, Thanakrit Neamhom, Pobploy Petchmedyai, Supawadee Noodaeng et al.
2 links
Environmental Challenges
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Comparative carbon footprint analysis of semi-digital and fully digital implant-supported prosthesis fabrication processes

Withida Patthanaissaranukool, Thanakrit Neamhom, Pobploy Petchmedyai, Supawadee Noodaeng, Anatcha Janthasen, Athit Ponthip
article en

Abstract

• Carbon intensity of implant impression ranges from 31.8 to 35.0 kgCO 2 eq per unit. • A major source of emissions was electricity consumption for steam sterilization. • Hybrid ceramic block method shows higher emission costs compared to zirconia disk. • Fully digital process using a zirconia disc is recommended for sustainable dental practice. Amid growing climate concerns, dental practices have emerged as notable contributors to carbon emissions, particularly with the increasing of integrated digital technology. This study aims to evaluate the environemtnal and economic impacts of four different implant-supported prosthesis fabrication workflows. Data on resource and energy consumption were collected from two types of fabrication processes: semi-digital and fully digital, using either zirconia discs or hybrid ceramic blocks. The results revealed that: (1) the semi-digital process with a zirconia disc emitted 35.1 kgCO₂eq per unit, (2) the semi-digital process with a hybrid ceramic block emitted 32.8 kgCO₂eq per unit, (3) the fully digital process with a zirconia disc emitted 34.5 kgCO₂eq per unit, (4) the fully digital process with a hybrid ceramic block emitted 31.8 kgCO₂eq per unit, and (5) the major hotspots of emissions were electricity consumption for steam sterilization of dental equipment and the sintering furnace used in crown fabrication. Considering both environmental and economic aspects, the fully digital implant impression process using a zirconia disc offered the better balance of sustainability. It offers the lowest amount of production cost (26.0 USD/unit) and net emission cost (0.75 USD/kgCO₂eq) compared to other processes. These findings provide valuable insights for patients and healthcare policymakers in selecting an environmentally friendly implant impression process. Additionally, the integration of digital dentistry and strategic material selection should be prioritized in the development of future clinical guidelines and sustainability-oriented dental policies.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 20
Mahidol University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.