Understanding Driving Automation Limitations: A Taxonomy Bridging System Constraints and Observable Cues

This study presents a taxonomy for classifying the limitations of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) based on both system characteristics and cues observable to drivers. The taxonomy includes four dimensions: source of uncertainty, operational domain, constraint mechanism, and cue type. It was developed using existing safety frameworks and applied to two real-world datasets: Tesla crash summaries and selected National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) incident reports. The taxonomy identified eight types of limitations and classified each case based on the type of system limitation involved, such as perception failures due to the environment or control issues during interactions with other road users. Results show differences in limitation patterns across datasets and highlight cases that resist clear classification, such as phantom braking. By linking system limitation types with cues observable to the driver, this taxonomy can support the design of driver interfaces and training materials that help users understand when the system may not perform as expected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251367368
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Driving Automation Limitations: A Taxonomy Bridging System Constraints and Observable Cues

John D. Lee, Joonbum Lee, Heishiro Toyoda, Joshua Domeyer et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Understanding Driving Automation Limitations: A Taxonomy Bridging System Constraints and Observable Cues

John D. Lee, Joonbum Lee, Heishiro Toyoda, Joshua Domeyer, Jimin Kim
article en

Abstract

This study presents a taxonomy for classifying the limitations of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) based on both system characteristics and cues observable to drivers. The taxonomy includes four dimensions: source of uncertainty, operational domain, constraint mechanism, and cue type. It was developed using existing safety frameworks and applied to two real-world datasets: Tesla crash summaries and selected National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) incident reports. The taxonomy identified eight types of limitations and classified each case based on the type of system limitation involved, such as perception failures due to the environment or control issues during interactions with other road users. Results show differences in limitation patterns across datasets and highlight cases that resist clear classification, such as phantom braking. By linking system limitation types with cues observable to the driver, this taxonomy can support the design of driver interfaces and training materials that help users understand when the system may not perform as expected.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding Driving Automation Limitations: A Taxonomy Bridging System Constraints and Observable Cues — John D. Lee, Joonbum Lee, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS