Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with high flow nasal cannula on the coordination between swallowing and breathing in post-extubation patients, a randomized crossover study

Background: Coordination between swallowing and breathing is essential to prevent aspiration. Swallowing during expiration (E-E swallow) is considered the most protective pattern [1,2]. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may promote this pattern by increasing the proportion of E-E swallows [3-5], but their comparative effects in post-extubation patients remain unclear. Objectives: To compare the effects of nasal CPAP and HFNC on swallowing-breathing coordination patterns in post-extubation patients and to identify factors influencing this coordination Methods: This randomized, controlled, crossover trial includes patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 hours and were extubated within 48 hours prior to enrollment. Patients with dysphagia (modified water swallowing test score < 4) were excluded. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to Group A (CPAP  HFNC) or Group B (HFNC  CPAP). Each intervention is applied for 5 minutes, followed by three continuous water swallowing tests. Swallowing and respiratory phases are recorded using surface EMG and ECG-derived respiration. A 5-minute washout with low-flow nasal oxygen is provided between interventions. Swallowing–breathing coordination is classified into four patterns: E–E, I–E, E–I, and I–I. The primary outcome is the percentage of E-E swallows. Secondary outcomes include other patterns, swallowing frequency, expiratory time, and respiratory rate. All outcomes are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Hypothesis: CPAP and HFNC may differ in their effects on swallowing–breathing coordination, particularly in promoting the E–E pattern. Conclusion: This study explores how nasal CPAP and HFNC affect swallowing–breathing coordination and their potential impact on airway protection after extubation. Ethics and dissemination: Approved by the IRB, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Trial registration: TCTR20210607003

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Critical Care
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v33.275059
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with high flow nasal cannula on the coordination between swallowing and breathing in post-extubation patients, a randomized crossover study

Napplika Kongpolprom, Sawita Cowawintaweewat
Clinical Critical Care
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with high flow nasal cannula on the coordination between swallowing and breathing in post-extubation patients, a randomized crossover study

Napplika Kongpolprom, Sawita Cowawintaweewat
article en

Abstract

Background: Coordination between swallowing and breathing is essential to prevent aspiration. Swallowing during expiration (E-E swallow) is considered the most protective pattern [1,2]. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may promote this pattern by increasing the proportion of E-E swallows [3-5], but their comparative effects in post-extubation patients remain unclear. Objectives: To compare the effects of nasal CPAP and HFNC on swallowing-breathing coordination patterns in post-extubation patients and to identify factors influencing this coordination Methods: This randomized, controlled, crossover trial includes patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 hours and were extubated within 48 hours prior to enrollment. Patients with dysphagia (modified water swallowing test score < 4) were excluded. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to Group A (CPAP  HFNC) or Group B (HFNC  CPAP). Each intervention is applied for 5 minutes, followed by three continuous water swallowing tests. Swallowing and respiratory phases are recorded using surface EMG and ECG-derived respiration. A 5-minute washout with low-flow nasal oxygen is provided between interventions. Swallowing–breathing coordination is classified into four patterns: E–E, I–E, E–I, and I–I. The primary outcome is the percentage of E-E swallows. Secondary outcomes include other patterns, swallowing frequency, expiratory time, and respiratory rate. All outcomes are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Hypothesis: CPAP and HFNC may differ in their effects on swallowing–breathing coordination, particularly in promoting the E–E pattern. Conclusion: This study explores how nasal CPAP and HFNC affect swallowing–breathing coordination and their potential impact on airway protection after extubation. Ethics and dissemination: Approved by the IRB, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Trial registration: TCTR20210607003

Clinical Critical Care
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.