Weighted Scoring Design for ART Healthcare Centre

<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Background:</strong> Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) centers are critical in providing medical, psychological, and social support to People Living with HIV (PLHIV), as per the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) guidelines. However, many ART centers in India face infrastructural inefficiencies, including overcrowding, poor ventilation, inadequate sanitation, and non-compliance with updated regulations. The existing layout of a long-operational ART center, established in 2008, has demonstrated such inefficiencies, necessitating a strategic redesign to optimize operational flow and improve patient outcomes.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study employed a weighted scoring system to evaluate and compare three proposed layout alternatives against the existing design. The methodology included activity flowchart mapping, space utilization studies, stakeholder input, and multi-criteria decision analysis. Twelve design evaluation criteria were prioritized using weighted scores, including feasibility (11%), patient safety (10.5%), workflow efficiency (10%), and objective adherence (13%). Designs were assessed for spatial efficiency, safety, robustness, usability, and environmental impact.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Results:</strong> Design 3 achieved the highest weighted score of 6.91, outperforming Design 2 (6.865), Design 1 (5.645), and the original layout (5.275). The optimal layout improved patient flow, integrated dedicated counseling areas, enhanced staff workspaces, and improved sanitation and ventilation. Correlation analyses highlighted critical interdependencies and trade-offs among feasibility, safety, and cost factors. Design 3 also demonstrated a 30–40% reduction in congestion, compliance with NACO standards, and enhanced operational efficiency.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The weighted scoring methodology effectively identified the optimal ART center layout. Design 3 significantly improved spatial organization, privacy, hygiene, and workflow. Future work could incorporate IoT-based monitoring and AI-driven real-time optimization for adaptive facility management. This model can be extended to other healthcare infrastructure redesigns to enhance quality and compliance.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers on Healthcare Research
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63918/fhr.v2.n2.p18-28.2025
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted Scoring Design for ART Healthcare Centre

Arjunsinh Vaghela Arjunsinh, Shiva Devarakonda Shiva, Jalpaba Chudasama Jalpaba
Frontiers on Healthcare Research
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
article

Weighted Scoring Design for ART Healthcare Centre

Arjunsinh Vaghela Arjunsinh, Shiva Devarakonda Shiva, Jalpaba Chudasama Jalpaba
article en

Abstract

<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Background:</strong> Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) centers are critical in providing medical, psychological, and social support to People Living with HIV (PLHIV), as per the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) guidelines. However, many ART centers in India face infrastructural inefficiencies, including overcrowding, poor ventilation, inadequate sanitation, and non-compliance with updated regulations. The existing layout of a long-operational ART center, established in 2008, has demonstrated such inefficiencies, necessitating a strategic redesign to optimize operational flow and improve patient outcomes.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study employed a weighted scoring system to evaluate and compare three proposed layout alternatives against the existing design. The methodology included activity flowchart mapping, space utilization studies, stakeholder input, and multi-criteria decision analysis. Twelve design evaluation criteria were prioritized using weighted scores, including feasibility (11%), patient safety (10.5%), workflow efficiency (10%), and objective adherence (13%). Designs were assessed for spatial efficiency, safety, robustness, usability, and environmental impact.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Results:</strong> Design 3 achieved the highest weighted score of 6.91, outperforming Design 2 (6.865), Design 1 (5.645), and the original layout (5.275). The optimal layout improved patient flow, integrated dedicated counseling areas, enhanced staff workspaces, and improved sanitation and ventilation. Correlation analyses highlighted critical interdependencies and trade-offs among feasibility, safety, and cost factors. Design 3 also demonstrated a 30–40% reduction in congestion, compliance with NACO standards, and enhanced operational efficiency.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The weighted scoring methodology effectively identified the optimal ART center layout. Design 3 significantly improved spatial organization, privacy, hygiene, and workflow. Future work could incorporate IoT-based monitoring and AI-driven real-time optimization for adaptive facility management. This model can be extended to other healthcare infrastructure redesigns to enhance quality and compliance.</p>

Frontiers on Healthcare ResearchVol. 2(2)
Indian Navy (IN), Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Pramukhswami Medical College (IN), Armed Forces Medical College (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.