Design Matters: Scale Design and Rounding Ratings Impacts NASA-TLX Results

The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is a widely used subjective measure of mental workload (MWL), but its visual design and postcollection data manipulation (rounding) practices lack standardization across studies. These inconsistencies may bias results. This secondary analysis of a prior within-subjects experiment examined whether different response formats (Knob, Slider, Ask) affect TLX ratings. Friedman tests revealed significant differences between formats across all dimensions except Effort, regardless of rounding. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests further showed that rounding significantly alters the data distribution for each sub-scale. Parametric comparisons of the data between different task-difficulty conditions suggest that the experimental findings can be influenced by the response format used to collect ratings. These findings demonstrate how rounding and interface design can meaningfully influence TLX results. Therefore, greater consistency in documentation, implementation, and reporting is needed to improve reliability and reduce bias in future studies. We call for further research into these issues

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251371038
Primary Topic
Space Exploration and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Matters: Scale Design and Rounding Ratings Impacts NASA-TLX Results

Matthew L. Bolton, Skye Taylor
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Space Exploration and Technology
article

Design Matters: Scale Design and Rounding Ratings Impacts NASA-TLX Results

Matthew L. Bolton, Skye Taylor
article en

Abstract

The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is a widely used subjective measure of mental workload (MWL), but its visual design and postcollection data manipulation (rounding) practices lack standardization across studies. These inconsistencies may bias results. This secondary analysis of a prior within-subjects experiment examined whether different response formats (Knob, Slider, Ask) affect TLX ratings. Friedman tests revealed significant differences between formats across all dimensions except Effort, regardless of rounding. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests further showed that rounding significantly alters the data distribution for each sub-scale. Parametric comparisons of the data between different task-difficulty conditions suggest that the experimental findings can be influenced by the response format used to collect ratings. These findings demonstrate how rounding and interface design can meaningfully influence TLX results. Therefore, greater consistency in documentation, implementation, and reporting is needed to improve reliability and reduce bias in future studies. We call for further research into these issues

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Space Exploration and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.