Citrate versus heparin lock in hemodialysis catheter’s complications; a randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Permanent central venous catheters (CVCs) are utilized in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis who lack alternative vascular access or are awaiting kidney transplantation or the development of a long-term vascular access. The primary complications associated with CVCs include catheter-related infections (CRIs) and catheter lumen thrombosis, collectively contributing to catheter dysfunction. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 4% sodium citrate and heparin lock solutions in maintaining hemodialysis catheters, focusing on catheter dysfunction and infection, coagulation parameters, and serum calcium levels. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 58 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, who were randomly assigned into two parallel groups. The intervention group (Citra-Lock; n = 29) received a lock solution containing 4% sodium citrate, while the control group (Heparin-Lock; n = 29) was administered a heparin 5000 IU lock. Data regarding hemorrhagic or coagulation events (e.g., prolonged partial thromboplastin time [PTT]), infections, catheter-related obstructions, and bleeding at the catheter site were prospectively collected and analyzed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 27, with a P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The male-to-female ratio in the study population was 1.52. A significant difference was observed in PTT changes between Citra-Lock and heparin-lock groups (P<0.001). However, no significant differences were found in platelet counts or international normalized ratio (INR) levels (186750±9580 versus 175586±10424 and 1.00 versus 1.00; P= 0.247, P=0.326 respectively). Besides, there were no statistically significant differences in catheter related complications (P=0.669). Conclusion: In patients with durable hemodialysis catheters, the administration of a 4% sodium citrate lock solution was associated with fewer changes in PTT compared to heparin locks, without increasing the risk of infections or other catheter-related complications. Trial registration: The trial was approved by the Iranian registry of clinical trial (identifier: IRCT20231018059761N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75555, ethical code; IR.IUMS.FMD. REC.1402.459).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nephropathology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/jnp.2025.27589
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citrate versus heparin lock in hemodialysis catheter’s complications; a randomized clinical trial

Shahrzad Ossareh, Fereshteh Saddadi, Mohammad Hassan Fallahkohan, Mahsa Kohansal Vajargah
Journal of Nephropathology
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Citrate versus heparin lock in hemodialysis catheter’s complications; a randomized clinical trial

Shahrzad Ossareh, Fereshteh Saddadi, Mohammad Hassan Fallahkohan, Mahsa Kohansal Vajargah
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Permanent central venous catheters (CVCs) are utilized in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis who lack alternative vascular access or are awaiting kidney transplantation or the development of a long-term vascular access. The primary complications associated with CVCs include catheter-related infections (CRIs) and catheter lumen thrombosis, collectively contributing to catheter dysfunction. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 4% sodium citrate and heparin lock solutions in maintaining hemodialysis catheters, focusing on catheter dysfunction and infection, coagulation parameters, and serum calcium levels. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 58 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, who were randomly assigned into two parallel groups. The intervention group (Citra-Lock; n = 29) received a lock solution containing 4% sodium citrate, while the control group (Heparin-Lock; n = 29) was administered a heparin 5000 IU lock. Data regarding hemorrhagic or coagulation events (e.g., prolonged partial thromboplastin time [PTT]), infections, catheter-related obstructions, and bleeding at the catheter site were prospectively collected and analyzed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 27, with a P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The male-to-female ratio in the study population was 1.52. A significant difference was observed in PTT changes between Citra-Lock and heparin-lock groups (P<0.001). However, no significant differences were found in platelet counts or international normalized ratio (INR) levels (186750±9580 versus 175586±10424 and 1.00 versus 1.00; P= 0.247, P=0.326 respectively). Besides, there were no statistically significant differences in catheter related complications (P=0.669). Conclusion: In patients with durable hemodialysis catheters, the administration of a 4% sodium citrate lock solution was associated with fewer changes in PTT compared to heparin locks, without increasing the risk of infections or other catheter-related complications. Trial registration: The trial was approved by the Iranian registry of clinical trial (identifier: IRCT20231018059761N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/75555, ethical code; IR.IUMS.FMD. REC.1402.459).

Journal of NephropathologyVol. 14(3)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Hasheminejad Kidney Center (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.