Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms

Student behavior intelligence recognition is a very important component of intelligent evaluation in university classrooms. Firstly, 1000 images containing various types of student behaviors in university classrooms were collected to construct a student behavior recognition dataset. These student behaviors include listen, read, write, bow, lie, yawn, drink, play, glance and trick. Then, classic CNN object recognition methods including SSD, Faster RCNN, YOLOV8, YOLOV11 and YOLOV12 were used to recognize student behaviors in university classrooms on the above dataset and the recognition performance of different methods was compared and analyzed. The experimental results show that YOLOV12 has the best student behavior recognition performance, with an mAP value of 0.521 and YOLO V11 has the fastest inference speed and the second highest recognition performance with an mAP value of 0.519.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Research and Policies
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53469/jerp.2025.07(08).12
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms

Yongheng Chen, Dong Wu, Leehsing Lu, T.‐Y. Liu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Educational Research and Policies
Emotion and Mood Recognition
2.12
article

Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms

Yongheng Chen, Dong Wu, Leehsing Lu, T.‐Y. Liu, Lixiang HU, Qin Lei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Student behavior intelligence recognition is a very important component of intelligent evaluation in university classrooms. Firstly, 1000 images containing various types of student behaviors in university classrooms were collected to construct a student behavior recognition dataset. These student behaviors include listen, read, write, bow, lie, yawn, drink, play, glance and trick. Then, classic CNN object recognition methods including SSD, Faster RCNN, YOLOV8, YOLOV11 and YOLOV12 were used to recognize student behaviors in university classrooms on the above dataset and the recognition performance of different methods was compared and analyzed. The experimental results show that YOLOV12 has the best student behavior recognition performance, with an mAP value of 0.521 and YOLO V11 has the fastest inference speed and the second highest recognition performance with an mAP value of 0.519.

Journal of Educational Research and PoliciesVol. 7(8)
Lingnan Normal University (CN), Guangdong Baiyun University (CN), Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison and Analysis of Student Behavior Recognition Methods in University Classrooms — Yongheng Chen, Dong Wu, et al. · Journal of Educational Research and Policies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS