Comparative analysis of optimized double-pressure, triple-pressure, and quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generators

Heat recovery steam generator is a component of Rankine cycle in combined cycle power plant. Conventionally, heat recovery steam generators are classified based on the number of pressure levels. Heat recovery steam generator with two and three pressure levels are double-pressure and triple-pressure heat recovery steam generators. Generally, power plants of large capacities use triple-pressure heat recovery steam generator, whereas power plants of small capacities use double-pressure heat recovery steam generator. However, no power plants use quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generator, which has four pressure levels, despite the fact that net power output of Rankine cycle increases with the number of pressure levels. In this paper, performances of double-pressure, triple-pressure, and quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generators are compared. All heat recovery steam generators are optimized with respect to their steam pressures and temperatures. Simulation results show that the net power output of Rankine cycle with quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generator is between 0.4 % and 0.9 % higher than that of Rankine cycle with triple-pressure heat recovery steam generator depending on inlet gas temperature and total heating surface area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106973
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of optimized double-pressure, triple-pressure, and quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generators

Somchart Chantasiriwan
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Comparative analysis of optimized double-pressure, triple-pressure, and quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generators

Somchart Chantasiriwan
article en

Abstract

Heat recovery steam generator is a component of Rankine cycle in combined cycle power plant. Conventionally, heat recovery steam generators are classified based on the number of pressure levels. Heat recovery steam generator with two and three pressure levels are double-pressure and triple-pressure heat recovery steam generators. Generally, power plants of large capacities use triple-pressure heat recovery steam generator, whereas power plants of small capacities use double-pressure heat recovery steam generator. However, no power plants use quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generator, which has four pressure levels, despite the fact that net power output of Rankine cycle increases with the number of pressure levels. In this paper, performances of double-pressure, triple-pressure, and quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generators are compared. All heat recovery steam generators are optimized with respect to their steam pressures and temperatures. Simulation results show that the net power output of Rankine cycle with quadruple-pressure heat recovery steam generator is between 0.4 % and 0.9 % higher than that of Rankine cycle with triple-pressure heat recovery steam generator depending on inlet gas temperature and total heating surface area.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 74
Thammasat University (TH)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.