Pets vs Humans: Who provides more meaningful social support to stressed pet owners?

Background: Mental health issues are prevalent in Australia. Social support has been observed as a protective factor against the effects of negative mental health among the general population. There are a substantial number of pet owners in Australia, and indications that emotional support is provided by pets. Whilst many pet owners report that their pets are a source of emotional support, clinicians question how important are pets, when compared to human companions, in affecting pet owner’s mental health. Objectives: This study examined the relationship between social support from humans and pets, and pet owner’s mental health. Methods: 112 pet owners completed measures related to mental health symptoms and perceived social support from families, friends, and significant others and emotional support from pets. Data was collected using three validated self-report scales, to assess mental health, perceived social support from humans, and perceived emotional comfort from pets. These were administered via an anonymous online survey over a period of 3 months to an Australian adult sample sourced via social media and veterinary practices. The collected data were analysed via a Pearson correlational analysis using SPSS (Version 27). Results: Whilst the study observed a significant relationship between human social support and pet owner’s mental health (r = 0.21, P < 0.05), social support from pets was not observed to be related with pet owner’s general mental health (r = 0.02, P > 0.05). Conclusion: When patients with mental health problems have pets, health care professionals need to encourage the patients to also source human social support, and not to rely on their pets to be the main source of social support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP)
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62992/2n7sjr80
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pets vs Humans: Who provides more meaningful social support to stressed pet owners?

H. J. Teoh, Kaxrine Xiyu Cai
International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP)
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Pets vs Humans: Who provides more meaningful social support to stressed pet owners?

H. J. Teoh, Kaxrine Xiyu Cai
article en

Abstract

Background: Mental health issues are prevalent in Australia. Social support has been observed as a protective factor against the effects of negative mental health among the general population. There are a substantial number of pet owners in Australia, and indications that emotional support is provided by pets. Whilst many pet owners report that their pets are a source of emotional support, clinicians question how important are pets, when compared to human companions, in affecting pet owner’s mental health. Objectives: This study examined the relationship between social support from humans and pets, and pet owner’s mental health. Methods: 112 pet owners completed measures related to mental health symptoms and perceived social support from families, friends, and significant others and emotional support from pets. Data was collected using three validated self-report scales, to assess mental health, perceived social support from humans, and perceived emotional comfort from pets. These were administered via an anonymous online survey over a period of 3 months to an Australian adult sample sourced via social media and veterinary practices. The collected data were analysed via a Pearson correlational analysis using SPSS (Version 27). Results: Whilst the study observed a significant relationship between human social support and pet owner’s mental health (r = 0.21, P < 0.05), social support from pets was not observed to be related with pet owner’s general mental health (r = 0.02, P > 0.05). Conclusion: When patients with mental health problems have pets, health care professionals need to encourage the patients to also source human social support, and not to rely on their pets to be the main source of social support.

International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP)
Australian Hearing (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (GB), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pets vs Humans: Who provides more meaningful social support to stressed pet owners? — H. J. Teoh, Kaxrine Xiyu Cai · International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS