Implementation Framework for Deep Learning Network in Hot Spot Identification of Photovoltaic Panels

The proposed framework for photovoltaic panel hot spot identification demonstrates excellent stability and accuracy in various scenarios. Experimental results show that the framework accurately identifies hot spots in clear, unobstructed, cloudy, and low-light conditions. The accuracy for clear, unobstructed conditions reaches 99.2%, with an F1 score of 99.0%. Even in complex scenarios (such as early morning low light), the accuracy remains at 94.6%. The recognition speed is 22-28ms per image, meeting real-time monitoring requirements. Compared with traditional methods (threshold segmentation and SVM), the accuracy improves by 15.8%-20.1%. Compared with deep learning models (YOLOv5 and Faster R-CNN), the accuracy is 2.2%-2.7% higher, the recognition speed is 5.1-16.9ms per image faster, and the model size and training time are superior, demonstrating the efficiency and practicality of the framework for hot spot identification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/jdb7nr60
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Framework for Deep Learning Network in Hot Spot Identification of Photovoltaic Panels

Jianfeng Li, T. T. Lei, Wende Wang, Ming Lei et al.
International Journal of Energy
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
article

Implementation Framework for Deep Learning Network in Hot Spot Identification of Photovoltaic Panels

Jianfeng Li, T. T. Lei, Wende Wang, Ming Lei, Qiao Jiang, Qijian Chan
article en

Abstract

The proposed framework for photovoltaic panel hot spot identification demonstrates excellent stability and accuracy in various scenarios. Experimental results show that the framework accurately identifies hot spots in clear, unobstructed, cloudy, and low-light conditions. The accuracy for clear, unobstructed conditions reaches 99.2%, with an F1 score of 99.0%. Even in complex scenarios (such as early morning low light), the accuracy remains at 94.6%. The recognition speed is 22-28ms per image, meeting real-time monitoring requirements. Compared with traditional methods (threshold segmentation and SVM), the accuracy improves by 15.8%-20.1%. Compared with deep learning models (YOLOv5 and Faster R-CNN), the accuracy is 2.2%-2.7% higher, the recognition speed is 5.1-16.9ms per image faster, and the model size and training time are superior, demonstrating the efficiency and practicality of the framework for hot spot identification.

International Journal of EnergyVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation Framework for Deep Learning Network in Hot Spot Identification of Photovoltaic Panels — Jianfeng Li, T. T. Lei, et al. · International Journal of Energy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS