Substrate‐Restricted Asymmetric Evolution of Solid‐State Nanopores

Abstract Nanopore evolution theories predict symmetrical expansion or shrinkage by changing free surface energy. Here, a substrate‐restricted regime is uncovered where this criterion fails: in a substrate‐supported ultrathin film, nanopores shrink universally regardless of initial size. Through in situ annealing and cross‐sectional STEM characterization, asymmetric pore dynamics are revealed ‐ top expansion and bottom shrinkage, with a minimum aperture reduced and forming a conical geometry. Such inhomogeneous variation is proposed to be driven by substrate‐restricted molecular migration, following an energy potential gradient along the nanopore channel, distinct from the equilibrium evolution. A generalized kinetics model identifies substrate confinement as an independent variable, establishing a thickness‐dependent critical radius, validated across both single pores and pore arrays. This redefines nanopore evolution in confined systems, with broad avenues for tunable nanoscale interface design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Theory and Simulations
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202501098
Primary Topic
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Substrate‐Restricted Asymmetric Evolution of Solid‐State Nanopores

Jufan Zhang, Fengzhou Fang, Da Qu, Mingzhi Yu et al.
Advanced Theory and Simulations
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
article

Substrate‐Restricted Asymmetric Evolution of Solid‐State Nanopores

Jufan Zhang, Fengzhou Fang, Da Qu, Mingzhi Yu, Hongshuai Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nanopore evolution theories predict symmetrical expansion or shrinkage by changing free surface energy. Here, a substrate‐restricted regime is uncovered where this criterion fails: in a substrate‐supported ultrathin film, nanopores shrink universally regardless of initial size. Through in situ annealing and cross‐sectional STEM characterization, asymmetric pore dynamics are revealed ‐ top expansion and bottom shrinkage, with a minimum aperture reduced and forming a conical geometry. Such inhomogeneous variation is proposed to be driven by substrate‐restricted molecular migration, following an energy potential gradient along the nanopore channel, distinct from the equilibrium evolution. A generalized kinetics model identifies substrate confinement as an independent variable, establishing a thickness‐dependent critical radius, validated across both single pores and pore arrays. This redefines nanopore evolution in confined systems, with broad avenues for tunable nanoscale interface design.

Advanced Theory and SimulationsVol. 8(12)
University College Dublin (IE), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Enterprise Ireland
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.