Systematic review of ocular trauma in indigenous populations in Australia (2010–2025): Epidemiology, aetiology, and surgical outcomes

Aim: To review the epidemiology, aetiology, and surgical outcomes of ocular trauma requiring surgical intervention in Indigenous populations in Australia from January 2010 to June 2025, highlighting implications for rural and remote communities. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE, identifying studies on ocular trauma in Indigenous Australians. Studies were included if they reported on epidemiology, aetiology, or surgical outcomes (visual acuity [VA] or complications). Data was synthesised to describe injury patterns, surgical interventions, and outcomes. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, covering 688 Indigenous cases requiring surgery across Far North Queensland (FNQ), Northern Territory (NT) and Western Australia (WA). Indigenous patients accounted for 19.6–29.2% of ocular trauma cases, despite their lower proportion in the general population. Mean age was 35.2 years (range: 2–81), with 83.6% male predominance. Open globe injuries (OGI) accounted for 43.5% (penetrating 48.2–51.6%, rupture 35.9–36.5%, intraocular foreign body [IOFB] 12.5–15.3%), and closed globe injuries (CGI) 56.5% (contusion 52.8–53.7%, lamellar laceration 25.9–28.3%). Assaults (45%) and alcohol-related injuries (46.3%) were leading causes. Surgical intervention occurred in 56.8% of cases, with 90–92.3% within 24 hours. Mean presenting VA was LogMAR 1.49 (6/180 Snellen), improving to LogMAR 0.86 (6/36, p

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Optometry
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648547.2025.v7.i2a.52
Primary Topic
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of ocular trauma in indigenous populations in Australia (2010–2025): Epidemiology, aetiology, and surgical outcomes

C. Gunaratnam, Ario Wilson‐Pogmore, Caroline McBurney, Brian Todd Franzco et al.
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Optometry
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
article

Systematic review of ocular trauma in indigenous populations in Australia (2010–2025): Epidemiology, aetiology, and surgical outcomes

C. Gunaratnam, Ario Wilson‐Pogmore, Caroline McBurney, Brian Todd Franzco, Stephen O’Hagan Franzco
article en

Abstract

Aim: To review the epidemiology, aetiology, and surgical outcomes of ocular trauma requiring surgical intervention in Indigenous populations in Australia from January 2010 to June 2025, highlighting implications for rural and remote communities. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE, identifying studies on ocular trauma in Indigenous Australians. Studies were included if they reported on epidemiology, aetiology, or surgical outcomes (visual acuity [VA] or complications). Data was synthesised to describe injury patterns, surgical interventions, and outcomes. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, covering 688 Indigenous cases requiring surgery across Far North Queensland (FNQ), Northern Territory (NT) and Western Australia (WA). Indigenous patients accounted for 19.6–29.2% of ocular trauma cases, despite their lower proportion in the general population. Mean age was 35.2 years (range: 2–81), with 83.6% male predominance. Open globe injuries (OGI) accounted for 43.5% (penetrating 48.2–51.6%, rupture 35.9–36.5%, intraocular foreign body [IOFB] 12.5–15.3%), and closed globe injuries (CGI) 56.5% (contusion 52.8–53.7%, lamellar laceration 25.9–28.3%). Assaults (45%) and alcohol-related injuries (46.3%) were leading causes. Surgical intervention occurred in 56.8% of cases, with 90–92.3% within 24 hours. Mean presenting VA was LogMAR 1.49 (6/180 Snellen), improving to LogMAR 0.86 (6/36, p

International Journal of Ophthalmology and OptometryVol. 7(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.