Baywatch in the Laboratory—Differences in Visual Surveillance Between Lifeguards and Non‐Lifeguards

ABSTRACT Quickly recognizing distress and drowning is an essential skill for lifeguards. Unfortunately, it is unclear to what extent visual behavior contributes to the ability of a lifeguard to detect hazardous aquatic situations. Twenty‐four non‐lifeguards and twenty‐four beach lifeguards watched two 15‐min clips filmed from the perspective of a beach lifeguard. Participants were instructed to press the spacebar if they would undertake an action, and call out why they reacted. No difference in the number of reactions or average fixation duration was found between groups. However, lifeguards looked ‘deeper’ in the sea than non‐lifeguards, had a higher variation in gaze location in the horizontal plane, and a lower variation in the vertical plane. For both lifeguards and non‐lifeguards, average fixation duration in the 5 s prior to a reaction was longer than the overall average fixation duration. Overall, results show experiential differences in visual behavior between lifeguards and non‐lifeguards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70110
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baywatch in the Laboratory—Differences in Visual Surveillance Between Lifeguards and Non‐Lifeguards

Jan Bourgois, Pieter Vansteenkiste, Matthieu Lenoir
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Baywatch in the Laboratory—Differences in Visual Surveillance Between Lifeguards and Non‐Lifeguards

Jan Bourgois, Pieter Vansteenkiste, Matthieu Lenoir
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Quickly recognizing distress and drowning is an essential skill for lifeguards. Unfortunately, it is unclear to what extent visual behavior contributes to the ability of a lifeguard to detect hazardous aquatic situations. Twenty‐four non‐lifeguards and twenty‐four beach lifeguards watched two 15‐min clips filmed from the perspective of a beach lifeguard. Participants were instructed to press the spacebar if they would undertake an action, and call out why they reacted. No difference in the number of reactions or average fixation duration was found between groups. However, lifeguards looked ‘deeper’ in the sea than non‐lifeguards, had a higher variation in gaze location in the horizontal plane, and a lower variation in the vertical plane. For both lifeguards and non‐lifeguards, average fixation duration in the 5 s prior to a reaction was longer than the overall average fixation duration. Overall, results show experiential differences in visual behavior between lifeguards and non‐lifeguards.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 39(5)
Polish Institute of International Affairs (PL), Ghent University (BE), Médecins du Monde (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Baywatch in the Laboratory—Differences in Visual Surveillance Between Lifeguards and Non‐Lifeguards — Jan Bourgois, Pieter Vansteenkiste, et al. · Applied Cognitive Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS