A Review on Estimation of in Situ Rock Stress

Successful estimation of in situ rock stress field (rock stress tensor) is of paramount importance for safe and economic design as well as execution of any project within the domains of Civil Engineering, Mining Engineering, Petroleum Engineering and Geological / Geophysical research. The regional rock stress field is primarily governed by the Earth’s tectonic movements, whereas the project specific in situ stress field is controlled by overburden pressure, topography, geological structures etc. While using a geotechnical software for designing an engineering structure, in situ rock stress shares equal weightage beside rock strength parameters. Several authors have proposed different empirical relationships between overburden depth, rock density, deformation modulus to calculate the magnitude of vertical stress and ratio of average horizontal stress to vertical stress (k). Use of geological structures like fault, fold, intrusive dike, joint & fracture have also been proposed to decipher directions of principal stresses. Existence of high horizontal stress relative to vertical stress is indicated by phenomenon like core disking, borehole break out during exploratory drilling. However, in situ rock mechanical tests (Overcoring, Hydraulic Fracturing, Hydraulic Testing in Pre-existing Fractures or HTPF etc) must be performed to ascertain the magnitudes and directions of all three principal stresses, prevalent to a project site. Owing to the uncertainties associated with absolute quantification of rock stress magnitude, use of the term ‘stress estimation’ is preferred. Although the term ‘stress measurement’ is used when the stress tensor is estimated by applying aforesaid in situ rock mechanical tests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.73866
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review on Estimation of in Situ Rock Stress

S. N. Mukherjee
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

A Review on Estimation of in Situ Rock Stress

S. N. Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

Successful estimation of in situ rock stress field (rock stress tensor) is of paramount importance for safe and economic design as well as execution of any project within the domains of Civil Engineering, Mining Engineering, Petroleum Engineering and Geological / Geophysical research. The regional rock stress field is primarily governed by the Earth’s tectonic movements, whereas the project specific in situ stress field is controlled by overburden pressure, topography, geological structures etc. While using a geotechnical software for designing an engineering structure, in situ rock stress shares equal weightage beside rock strength parameters. Several authors have proposed different empirical relationships between overburden depth, rock density, deformation modulus to calculate the magnitude of vertical stress and ratio of average horizontal stress to vertical stress (k). Use of geological structures like fault, fold, intrusive dike, joint & fracture have also been proposed to decipher directions of principal stresses. Existence of high horizontal stress relative to vertical stress is indicated by phenomenon like core disking, borehole break out during exploratory drilling. However, in situ rock mechanical tests (Overcoring, Hydraulic Fracturing, Hydraulic Testing in Pre-existing Fractures or HTPF etc) must be performed to ascertain the magnitudes and directions of all three principal stresses, prevalent to a project site. Owing to the uncertainties associated with absolute quantification of rock stress magnitude, use of the term ‘stress estimation’ is preferred. Although the term ‘stress measurement’ is used when the stress tensor is estimated by applying aforesaid in situ rock mechanical tests.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.