Artificial Intelligence and Human Therapy Supervisors are Interchangeable

This study compares the quality of treatment plans generated by human mental health professionals and artificial intelligence (AI) agents across five therapeutic modalities: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), emotionally focused therapy (EFT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and internal family systems (IFS). Seven interdisciplinary groups of five licensed therapists, each comprising one specialist from each modality, developed treatment plans for standardized case vignettes alongside AI-generated plans. A panel of independent judges conducted blind evaluations based on clinical soundness, relevance, completeness, applicability, practicality, and ethical considerations. The study shows that AI-generated treatment plans are indistinguishable in quality to those created by human professionals, offering insights into the potential role of AI in clinical mental health settings, especially in contexts where supervision is limited or inaccessible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Athens Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30958/ajpsy.1-3-4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Human Therapy Supervisors are Interchangeable

Jila Behnad, Babak Hodjat
Athens Journal of Psychology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence and Human Therapy Supervisors are Interchangeable

Jila Behnad, Babak Hodjat
article en

Abstract

This study compares the quality of treatment plans generated by human mental health professionals and artificial intelligence (AI) agents across five therapeutic modalities: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), emotionally focused therapy (EFT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and internal family systems (IFS). Seven interdisciplinary groups of five licensed therapists, each comprising one specialist from each modality, developed treatment plans for standardized case vignettes alongside AI-generated plans. A panel of independent judges conducted blind evaluations based on clinical soundness, relevance, completeness, applicability, practicality, and ethical considerations. The study shows that AI-generated treatment plans are indistinguishable in quality to those created by human professionals, offering insights into the potential role of AI in clinical mental health settings, especially in contexts where supervision is limited or inaccessible.

Athens Journal of PsychologyVol. 1(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.