An Analysis of Respiratory System Test Subjects: A Complete and Structured Guide

This study aims to evaluate the quality of 20 biology summative assessment items on respiratory system material for class XII in nine high schools spread across Sumatra and Sulawesi during the odd semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The research subjects involved 130 students, and data were collected through Google Form. The analysis was conducted using Anates software version 4.0.9, including the validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiating power, and quality of item triggers. The results showed that 75% of the questions had good validity, while the other 25% required revision. The reliability value of 0.82 indicates high consistency. Most of the questions had a moderate level of difficulty (75%), while some questions needed to be adjusted to reach the ideal proportion. In terms of differentiating power, the majority of questions were able to differentiate between high and low ability learners effectively, although some questions required improvement. Excerpts analysis showed that most of the options functioned well, but the less effective exterminators needed revision. This study concludes that the items have good overall quality, but still require some improvement to increase accuracy and effectiveness as an evaluation instrument for biology learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL IQRA
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i2.6182
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Respiratory System Test Subjects: A Complete and Structured Guide

Cici Nur Azizah, Diki Koerniadi, Ridwan Ridwan, Sunarto Arif Sura et al.
JURNAL IQRA
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

An Analysis of Respiratory System Test Subjects: A Complete and Structured Guide

Cici Nur Azizah, Diki Koerniadi, Ridwan Ridwan, Sunarto Arif Sura, Lia Zaradiva
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the quality of 20 biology summative assessment items on respiratory system material for class XII in nine high schools spread across Sumatra and Sulawesi during the odd semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The research subjects involved 130 students, and data were collected through Google Form. The analysis was conducted using Anates software version 4.0.9, including the validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiating power, and quality of item triggers. The results showed that 75% of the questions had good validity, while the other 25% required revision. The reliability value of 0.82 indicates high consistency. Most of the questions had a moderate level of difficulty (75%), while some questions needed to be adjusted to reach the ideal proportion. In terms of differentiating power, the majority of questions were able to differentiate between high and low ability learners effectively, although some questions required improvement. Excerpts analysis showed that most of the options functioned well, but the less effective exterminators needed revision. This study concludes that the items have good overall quality, but still require some improvement to increase accuracy and effectiveness as an evaluation instrument for biology learning.

JURNAL IQRAVol. 10(2)
Indonesia University of Education (ID), State University of Padang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.