A multicenter study on the comparability of myocardial strain values acquired with different CMR scanners and analyzed with different post-processing software: insights into the “Traveling Volunteers” study

Inter-scanner reproducibility for CMR FT measurements was high for GLS and GCS, suggesting potential use in routine CMR examinations. However, strain values between the two software vendors (CVI and Medis) were significantly different, indicating the need for standardization and implementation of software-specific cutoff values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03499-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multicenter study on the comparability of myocardial strain values acquired with different CMR scanners and analyzed with different post-processing software: insights into the “Traveling Volunteers” study

Wensu Chen, Volkmar Falk, Stephanie Wiesemann, Jeanette Schulz‐Menger et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
2.72
article

A multicenter study on the comparability of myocardial strain values acquired with different CMR scanners and analyzed with different post-processing software: insights into the “Traveling Volunteers” study

Wensu Chen, Volkmar Falk, Stephanie Wiesemann, Jeanette Schulz‐Menger, Patrick Doeblin, Sebastian Kelle, Collin Goetze, Jennifer Erley, Aylin Bican Demir, Jochen Hansmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Inter-scanner reproducibility for CMR FT measurements was high for GLS and GCS, suggesting potential use in routine CMR examinations. However, strain values between the two software vendors (CVI and Medis) were significantly different, indicating the need for standardization and implementation of software-specific cutoff values.

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and SurgeryVol. 21(2)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Max Delbrück Center (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A multicenter study on the comparability of myocardial strain values acquired with different CMR scanners and analyzed with different post-processing software: insights into the “Traveling Volunteers” study — Wensu Chen, Volkmar Falk, et al. · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS