A Systematic Review of Academic Screening Tools for Active Bilingual Learners/Users of English

ABSTRACT Academic screener tools are commonly used within the context of multitiered systems of support, and it is expected that they have a high standard of technical adequacy, including reliability and validity evidence. In United States school systems, there are large numbers of students who speak languages other than English with varying levels of proficiency, and it is imperative that well‐developed academic screening tools be accessible to active bilingual users/users of English (ABLE) in languages beyond English. This review evaluated the translation process, norming data, and National Center on Intensive Interventions (NCII) standards of academic screening tools that were available in the fall 2023 in early literacy, reading, and math in languages other than English. Information was coded using a rigorous, double‐coding process. Findings revealed that academic screening tools for ABLE students are available only in English and Spanish. Very few academic screeners met development criteria for translated measures or met convincing evidence standards established by the NCII. Academic screening conducted in languages other than English is severely constrained by limited availability of high‐quality measures. Additional effort should be devoted to developing new measures and appropriately translating and trans‐adapting existing measures for ABLE students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70093
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Academic Screening Tools for Active Bilingual Learners/Users of English

Bryn Harris, Morgan C. Huenergarde, Randy G. Floyd, José Armando Peña Moreno
Psychology in the Schools
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

A Systematic Review of Academic Screening Tools for Active Bilingual Learners/Users of English

Bryn Harris, Morgan C. Huenergarde, Randy G. Floyd, José Armando Peña Moreno
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Academic screener tools are commonly used within the context of multitiered systems of support, and it is expected that they have a high standard of technical adequacy, including reliability and validity evidence. In United States school systems, there are large numbers of students who speak languages other than English with varying levels of proficiency, and it is imperative that well‐developed academic screening tools be accessible to active bilingual users/users of English (ABLE) in languages beyond English. This review evaluated the translation process, norming data, and National Center on Intensive Interventions (NCII) standards of academic screening tools that were available in the fall 2023 in early literacy, reading, and math in languages other than English. Information was coded using a rigorous, double‐coding process. Findings revealed that academic screening tools for ABLE students are available only in English and Spanish. Very few academic screeners met development criteria for translated measures or met convincing evidence standards established by the NCII. Academic screening conducted in languages other than English is severely constrained by limited availability of high‐quality measures. Additional effort should be devoted to developing new measures and appropriately translating and trans‐adapting existing measures for ABLE students.

Psychology in the SchoolsVol. 63(2)
University of Denver (US), Colorado Department of Education (US), University of Colorado Denver (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.