HE SAGA OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROJECT (PEC)

Criminality is a complex issue that generates concern in society, especially in Brazil, due to the increase in violence in the country since 1972, when the urban population surpassed the rural population as a result of the exodustriggered by the so-called “Brazilian miracle.” As in previous administrations, the current government has already issued documents to address this urgent matter, a portfolio that now includes a Proposed Constitutional Amendment (PEC). These are relatively interesting suggestions, but they show themselves to be insufficient for being palliative, scattered, and inadequate, as the focus is directed solely at causality—the point where causes flow and effects return—without considering both components, which are essential to structuring the problem. Hence, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security’s (MJSP) efforts to gain support have not, thus far, amounted to an epic endeavor. The introduction of PEC-18, known as the Public Security PEC, has made it possible, to some extent, to identify two serious shortcomings. The lack of a genuine policing doctrine—with emphasis on terminology and conceptualization—has led to heterogeneous interpretations and varied manifestations. Even the name of the PEC—Public Security—is misguided, as it actually only presents proposals to address one of the threats—criminality—and, moreover, only certain portions of one of its aspects: containment. Another shortcoming is the lack of effective coordination at all three levels. This is mentioned in passing in the SUSP law and in the National Public Security and Social Defense Policy, but it has not been implemented effectively. Overall, it is understood that the MJSP acts impulsively in presenting a proposal for a demand that cannot be addressed by this ministry alone. In fact, it cannot even be addressed solely by the Government, since the treatment of threats—even if focused on only one—must begin with a State Policy. Keywords: Public Safety; Constitutional Amendment, PEC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Científica da Polícia Militar de Mato Grosso do Sul.
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62927/revpmms.v2i2.125
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HE SAGA OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROJECT (PEC)

Amauri Meireles
Revista Científica da Polícia Militar de Mato Grosso do Sul.
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

HE SAGA OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROJECT (PEC)

Amauri Meireles
article en

Abstract

Criminality is a complex issue that generates concern in society, especially in Brazil, due to the increase in violence in the country since 1972, when the urban population surpassed the rural population as a result of the exodustriggered by the so-called “Brazilian miracle.” As in previous administrations, the current government has already issued documents to address this urgent matter, a portfolio that now includes a Proposed Constitutional Amendment (PEC). These are relatively interesting suggestions, but they show themselves to be insufficient for being palliative, scattered, and inadequate, as the focus is directed solely at causality—the point where causes flow and effects return—without considering both components, which are essential to structuring the problem. Hence, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security’s (MJSP) efforts to gain support have not, thus far, amounted to an epic endeavor. The introduction of PEC-18, known as the Public Security PEC, has made it possible, to some extent, to identify two serious shortcomings. The lack of a genuine policing doctrine—with emphasis on terminology and conceptualization—has led to heterogeneous interpretations and varied manifestations. Even the name of the PEC—Public Security—is misguided, as it actually only presents proposals to address one of the threats—criminality—and, moreover, only certain portions of one of its aspects: containment. Another shortcoming is the lack of effective coordination at all three levels. This is mentioned in passing in the SUSP law and in the National Public Security and Social Defense Policy, but it has not been implemented effectively. Overall, it is understood that the MJSP acts impulsively in presenting a proposal for a demand that cannot be addressed by this ministry alone. In fact, it cannot even be addressed solely by the Government, since the treatment of threats—even if focused on only one—must begin with a State Policy. Keywords: Public Safety; Constitutional Amendment, PEC.

Revista Científica da Polícia Militar de Mato Grosso do Sul.Vol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.