Comprehensive review of the material life cycle and sustainability of solar photovoltaic panels

• Reviews solar panel manufacturing, energy matrices, and sustainability aspects. • Compares surveys by focus areas and highlights research gaps. • Evaluates energy use, payback time, and CO₂ emissions for three solar PV types. • Formulates five research questions on process, performance, and efficiency. • Suggests future research on recycling, energy use, durability, and lifespan. Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels due to their low carbon emissions and renewability. This survey followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods and proposed five research questions (RQs) to identify sustainable raw material extraction and refinement methods in solar PV technologies. It aimed to determine the best-performing PV systems regarding energy consumption, energy payback time (EPBT), and global warming potential (GWP/CO 2 emissions) across generations, as well as the most efficient PV systems for outdoor use. RQ1 presented environmentally friendly raw material extraction and refinement techniques, such as glycine leaching and ionic liquids, in line with Life Cycle Assessment principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12. RQ2 indicated that single-crystalline silicon (SC-Si) (19 to 48 GJ/kW), gallium arsenide (GaAs) (10 to 20 GJ/kW), and concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) (4.3 to 13 GJ/kW) had the highest energy demands. RQ3 found that SC-Si (1–4 years), copper indium selenide (1.87–9.44 years), and organic PV cells (0.2–4 years) had the longest EPBTs. RQ4 identified the highest GWP in SC-Si (40 to 60 g CO 2 -eq/kWh), GaAs (40 to 70 g CO 2 -eq/kWh), and perovskite solar cells (20 to 60 g CO 2 -eq/kWh). RQ5 showed that CPV technology had the highest outdoor efficiency at 33 %. After a thorough review, we proposed future research directions, including a list of recyclables, reusable, and disposable materials to enhance PV sustainability, evaluating energy consumption across additional life cycle stages, and developing methods to extend panel lifespan, reduce replacements, and minimize waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113927
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive review of the material life cycle and sustainability of solar photovoltaic panels

David Ompong, Deepika Mathur, Sami Azam, Arefin Ittesafun Abian
Solar Energy
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Comprehensive review of the material life cycle and sustainability of solar photovoltaic panels

David Ompong, Deepika Mathur, Sami Azam, Arefin Ittesafun Abian
article en

Abstract

• Reviews solar panel manufacturing, energy matrices, and sustainability aspects. • Compares surveys by focus areas and highlights research gaps. • Evaluates energy use, payback time, and CO₂ emissions for three solar PV types. • Formulates five research questions on process, performance, and efficiency. • Suggests future research on recycling, energy use, durability, and lifespan. Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels due to their low carbon emissions and renewability. This survey followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods and proposed five research questions (RQs) to identify sustainable raw material extraction and refinement methods in solar PV technologies. It aimed to determine the best-performing PV systems regarding energy consumption, energy payback time (EPBT), and global warming potential (GWP/CO 2 emissions) across generations, as well as the most efficient PV systems for outdoor use. RQ1 presented environmentally friendly raw material extraction and refinement techniques, such as glycine leaching and ionic liquids, in line with Life Cycle Assessment principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12. RQ2 indicated that single-crystalline silicon (SC-Si) (19 to 48 GJ/kW), gallium arsenide (GaAs) (10 to 20 GJ/kW), and concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) (4.3 to 13 GJ/kW) had the highest energy demands. RQ3 found that SC-Si (1–4 years), copper indium selenide (1.87–9.44 years), and organic PV cells (0.2–4 years) had the longest EPBTs. RQ4 identified the highest GWP in SC-Si (40 to 60 g CO 2 -eq/kWh), GaAs (40 to 70 g CO 2 -eq/kWh), and perovskite solar cells (20 to 60 g CO 2 -eq/kWh). RQ5 showed that CPV technology had the highest outdoor efficiency at 33 %. After a thorough review, we proposed future research directions, including a list of recyclables, reusable, and disposable materials to enhance PV sustainability, evaluating energy consumption across additional life cycle stages, and developing methods to extend panel lifespan, reduce replacements, and minimize waste.

Solar EnergyVol. 301
Charles Darwin University (AU), United International University (BD)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.