New insight into the genesis of giant Maoling arsenopyrite-type gold deposit, Liaodong Peninsula, NE China
• Maoling is an arsenopyrite-dominated gold deposit, with invisible gold in arsenopyrite. • Gold replacement of As and Fe in the core of arsenopyrite in the Maoling gold deposit. • Ore-forming materials were derived from Proterozoic magmatic origin, with contributions from later magmatic activity. • The available data support a three-stage hydrothermal history for Maoling gold deposit. The genesis of the giant Maoling gold deposit in the Liaodong Peninsula of the North China Craton remains enigmatic due to the intricate gold distribution patterns and unresolved Au incorporation mechanism into arsenopyrite. The ore bodies are hosted by Proterozoic metamorphic rocks. Arsenopyrite is notably depleted in As and Fe but enriched in S. Gold contents in arsenopyrite, determined by the LA–ICP–MS spot analysis, range from 0.25 to 17.23 ppm. They are negatively correlated with Ag, Pb, and Bi, but positively correlated with Cu, Zn, Ni, Te and Se contents. Elemental concentration maps reveal Au-rich core, Mo-rich rim and Ag-rich microfracture within arsenopyrite. Our results, together with ionic radius and stoichiometric arsenopyrite, support the hypothesis that gold substitutes for Fe and As within the arsenopyrite crystal structure. New δ 34 S ratios determined on sulfides range from 6.9 ‰ to 10.9 ‰, closely matching sulfur isotope compositions of complex magmatic origin. Additionally, much low and linear distribution along the upper-crust trend, with values of 35.411 to 36.297 for 208 Pb/ 204 Pb, 15.430 to 15.486 for 207 Pb/ 204 Pb, and 15.800 to 16.477 for 206 Pb/ 204 Pb, respectively, thus pointing to a Proterozoic magmatic origin, with contributions from late-stage magmatic activity. Collectively, the available data support a three-stage hydrothermal history for Maoling gold deposit: Proterozoic intrusion-related gold event, a Jurassic intrusion-related molybdenum event, and Cretaceous structure-controlled silver hydrothermal event
Authors
- Lingli Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-5517)
- Qingdong Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-3625)
- Jin‐Hui Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-0620)
- Song Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-2360)
- Bing Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4851-4425)
- Jiwen Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-9208)
- Hartwig E. Frimmel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3041-8208)
- Hui Chen
- Yongbin Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-0894)
- Xiaoxia Duan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-5984)
- Zhihong Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-4702)
Institutions
- Hefei University of Technology (CN)
- Yunnan University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- China Geological Survey (CN)
- Institute of Geography (KZ)
- Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ore Geology Reviews
- Published
- 2025-08-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106852
- Primary Topic
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00