Effectiveness of prompt engineering strategies in generating mathematics educational content: An experimental study
Introduction. The article presents the results of a study on generating high-quality educational content in mathematical literacy for 5th-grade students using generative AI. The problem stems from the lack of adaptive assignments that meet educational standards and the limitations of AI (hallucinations, non-reproducibility). The aim of the study is to develop, test, and evaluate the effectiveness of an original prompt-engineering strategy for generating pedagogically relevant and age-appropriate math problems. Materials and Methods. The study employs systemic and activity-based approaches. Methods include analysis of AI applications in education, experimental task generation using a hybrid prompt-engineering strategy (Few-Shot Learning + Chain-of-Thought + Role Prompting) based on ChatGPT-4o, expert evaluation (10 mathematics teachers with ≥12 years of experience), and statistical data processing (Cohen’s κ, mean values µ). Verification involved generating tasks in a new context (airports) and assessing them based on adequacy, student-appropriateness, and complexity criteria. Results. Key findings demonstrate the successful implementation of the strategy, enabling the generation of structurally consistent tasks (κ = 0.82). The critical role of Chain-of-Thought prompting in creating multi-step problems is emphasized. The authors highlight the dual functionality of tasks (learning and assessment). The experiment confirmed high expert ratings for adequacy (µ = 4.81), format compliance (µ = 4.77), and descriptive completeness (µ = 4.82). A limitation in terminology complexity for some tasks was identified. Conclusions. The study concludes that the combined prompt-engineering strategy is highly effective for generating standards-aligned tasks and has strong potential for integration into digital learning platforms. Further optimization of linguistic adaptation and the development of a validation pipeline are required for implementation.
Authors
- Marina Lukoyanova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-0876)
- Leila Salekhova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8177-3739)
- Andrey Danilov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-1157)
- Nailya Batrova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-3507)
- Rinata Zaripova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-5513)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science for Education Today
- Published
- 2025-08-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2504.05
- Primary Topic
- Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00