Legal Regulation of Economic Concentration (Tech-Over) in the Digital Market

The rapid expansion of digital markets has led to unprecedented economic concentration, driven primarily by large technology platforms acquiring, integrating, or excluding smaller competitors through mechanisms often referred to as “Tech-Over.” This study offers a comparative legal analysis of how three diverse jurisdictions Turkey, France, and Singapore are regulating this phenomenon. Using a qualitative case study methodology, the research evaluates legal frameworks, regulatory instruments, institutional capacity, and enforcement practices. The findings reveal that while France employs an ex-ante model embedded in EU law, Singapore emphasizes adaptive, guideline-based governance, and Turkey is transitioning toward more robust digital oversight. Despite differences, all three jurisdictions converge on the need to monitor data control, algorithmic opacity, and cross-market dominance. The article concludes with policy recommendations for enhancing merger control, increasing institutional capability, and fostering international cooperation. These insights contribute to global debates on competition law reform and digital market governance in an era of platform capitalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.351
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Regulation of Economic Concentration (Tech-Over) in the Digital Market

Javokhir Eshonkulov
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Legal Regulation of Economic Concentration (Tech-Over) in the Digital Market

Javokhir Eshonkulov
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital markets has led to unprecedented economic concentration, driven primarily by large technology platforms acquiring, integrating, or excluding smaller competitors through mechanisms often referred to as “Tech-Over.” This study offers a comparative legal analysis of how three diverse jurisdictions Turkey, France, and Singapore are regulating this phenomenon. Using a qualitative case study methodology, the research evaluates legal frameworks, regulatory instruments, institutional capacity, and enforcement practices. The findings reveal that while France employs an ex-ante model embedded in EU law, Singapore emphasizes adaptive, guideline-based governance, and Turkey is transitioning toward more robust digital oversight. Despite differences, all three jurisdictions converge on the need to monitor data control, algorithmic opacity, and cross-market dominance. The article concludes with policy recommendations for enhancing merger control, increasing institutional capability, and fostering international cooperation. These insights contribute to global debates on competition law reform and digital market governance in an era of platform capitalism.

Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.Vol. 3(4)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.