Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach

Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107244
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach

Amrik Singh Khalsa, Brett R. Loman, Jiangjiang Zhu, Michael T. Bailey et al.
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Gut microbiota and health
article

Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach

Amrik Singh Khalsa, Brett R. Loman, Jiangjiang Zhu, Michael T. Bailey, Colleen Spees, Shuaixin Gao, Huan Zhang, Lixia Chen
article en

Abstract

Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.

Journal of Microbiological MethodsVol. 237
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.