Assessing Research Support Services in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Literature Review

The study systematically analyzes Research Support Services (RSS) in academic libraries through a comprehensive review of scholarly literature. The objective is to evaluate publication trends, geographical distribution, sample populations, journal coverage, categorization models, core components, implementation challenges, and developmental insights. A systematic review methodology was adopted, utilizing databases Scopus and the Web of Science. The search strategy employed keyword combinations (e.g., “research support services,” “research services and library,” and “academic library”), supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking. This resulted in a final selection of 43 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1992 and 2024. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The analysis reveals a progressive increase in literature on RSS, with recent focus areas including research data management, bibliometric services, and open access initiatives. Core services identified encompass citation management, data curation, bibliometric analysis, and support for scholarly communication. Key challenges include limited resources, technological barriers, and professional skill gaps. The study emphasizes the need for strategic innovation, including integration of artificial intelligence and collaborative service models. The findings offer significant implications for library administrators, researchers, and policymakers, and represent a pioneering global synthesis of RSS trends and practices in academic libraries.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Library and Information Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v72i3.18904
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Research Support Services in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Literature Review

1 citations
Annals of Library and Information Studies
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
article

Assessing Research Support Services in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Literature Review

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study systematically analyzes Research Support Services (RSS) in academic libraries through a comprehensive review of scholarly literature. The objective is to evaluate publication trends, geographical distribution, sample populations, journal coverage, categorization models, core components, implementation challenges, and developmental insights. A systematic review methodology was adopted, utilizing databases Scopus and the Web of Science. The search strategy employed keyword combinations (e.g., “research support services,” “research services and library,” and “academic library”), supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking. This resulted in a final selection of 43 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1992 and 2024. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The analysis reveals a progressive increase in literature on RSS, with recent focus areas including research data management, bibliometric services, and open access initiatives. Core services identified encompass citation management, data curation, bibliometric analysis, and support for scholarly communication. Key challenges include limited resources, technological barriers, and professional skill gaps. The study emphasizes the need for strategic innovation, including integration of artificial intelligence and collaborative service models. The findings offer significant implications for library administrators, researchers, and policymakers, and represent a pioneering global synthesis of RSS trends and practices in academic libraries.

Annals of Library and Information StudiesVol. 72(3)
Marymount University (US)
Universiteit Stellenbosch, Bharathiar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Research Support Services in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Literature Review · Annals of Library and Information Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS