Developing New Expressions of Reconciliation Ecology in the Anthropocene: A One Health Approach to Christian Environmental Stewardship

The past century was a time of significant ecological change, driven mainly by the activities of humans. Accelerating rates of biodiversity decline, loss of important ecosystem services, and climate change are symptoms of anthropogenic stress on proximate and global environments. Both conservation paradigms and Christian perspectives on environmental stewardship of the early 20th century tended to view humans as separate from ecological systems and not affected by environmental degradation. In recent decades, environmental concerns, including the emergence of zoonotic diseases, have increased focus on mutual dependencies between humans and the environment. While models of creation care have lagged behind secular conservation approaches, recent approaches emphasizing reciprocity, such as the reconciliation ecology paradigm, provide opportunities to develop a holistic framework of mutual flourishing. Here, I introduce the One Health concept, which highlights the interdependencies of human, animal, and environmental health systems, as a logical extension of the reconciliation ecology paradigm.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf9-25miller
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing New Expressions of Reconciliation Ecology in the Anthropocene: A One Health Approach to Christian Environmental Stewardship

William L. Miller
Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Developing New Expressions of Reconciliation Ecology in the Anthropocene: A One Health Approach to Christian Environmental Stewardship

William L. Miller
article en

Abstract

The past century was a time of significant ecological change, driven mainly by the activities of humans. Accelerating rates of biodiversity decline, loss of important ecosystem services, and climate change are symptoms of anthropogenic stress on proximate and global environments. Both conservation paradigms and Christian perspectives on environmental stewardship of the early 20th century tended to view humans as separate from ecological systems and not affected by environmental degradation. In recent decades, environmental concerns, including the emergence of zoonotic diseases, have increased focus on mutual dependencies between humans and the environment. While models of creation care have lagged behind secular conservation approaches, recent approaches emphasizing reciprocity, such as the reconciliation ecology paradigm, provide opportunities to develop a holistic framework of mutual flourishing. Here, I introduce the One Health concept, which highlights the interdependencies of human, animal, and environmental health systems, as a logical extension of the reconciliation ecology paradigm.

Perspectives on Science and Christian FaithVol. 77(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing New Expressions of Reconciliation Ecology in the Anthropocene: A One Health Approach to Christian Environmental Stewardship — William L. Miller · Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS