AI-Powered Citation Classification: Understanding Contrasting and Supporting Citations in Scholarly Research

Citations play a critical role in the assessment of scholarly research. This study employs scite.ai, an artificial intelligence-based citation tool, which classifies citations into three categories: supporting, contrasting, and mentioning. The objective of the study is to explore the relationship between these citation types—particularly supporting and contrasting citations—and total citation counts in journals published by Elsevier. Using the journal-level search feature provided by Scite, data were manually collected from 3,151 Elsevier journals. Key metrics analysed include the Unweighted Scite Index (USI), total citation count, and the distribution of supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citations. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted to examine these relationships. The results reveal statistically significant and positively correlated associations (p < 0.01) between supporting, contrasting, and total citation counts, highlighting a meaningful linkage between citation polarity and overall citation impact in scholarly publishing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Library and Information Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v72i3.19939
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Citation Classification: Understanding Contrasting and Supporting Citations in Scholarly Research

Annals of Library and Information Studies
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI-Powered Citation Classification: Understanding Contrasting and Supporting Citations in Scholarly Research

article en

Abstract

Citations play a critical role in the assessment of scholarly research. This study employs scite.ai, an artificial intelligence-based citation tool, which classifies citations into three categories: supporting, contrasting, and mentioning. The objective of the study is to explore the relationship between these citation types—particularly supporting and contrasting citations—and total citation counts in journals published by Elsevier. Using the journal-level search feature provided by Scite, data were manually collected from 3,151 Elsevier journals. Key metrics analysed include the Unweighted Scite Index (USI), total citation count, and the distribution of supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citations. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted to examine these relationships. The results reveal statistically significant and positively correlated associations (p < 0.01) between supporting, contrasting, and total citation counts, highlighting a meaningful linkage between citation polarity and overall citation impact in scholarly publishing.

Annals of Library and Information StudiesVol. 72(3)
Marymount University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.