Voluntary Disclosure Quality and Analyst Coverage

ABSTRACT Prior work documents that managers increase the quantity of earnings guidance provided after exogenously losing coverage from an equity analyst. I examine how analysts influence guidance quality. I find that following an exogenous reduction in analyst coverage, managers issue earnings guidance that is lower quality (i.e., it is less accurate). This result varies predictably based on managers’ incentives, features of the firm’s analyst coverage, and the presence of other intermediaries. Overall, my findings identify a situation in which guidance quantity and quality move in divergent directions and highlight that analysts can be an important determinant of voluntary disclosure quality. JEL Classifications: G10; G17.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2021-0137
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voluntary Disclosure Quality and Analyst Coverage

J. Donald Warren
The Accounting Review
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Voluntary Disclosure Quality and Analyst Coverage

J. Donald Warren
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Prior work documents that managers increase the quantity of earnings guidance provided after exogenously losing coverage from an equity analyst. I examine how analysts influence guidance quality. I find that following an exogenous reduction in analyst coverage, managers issue earnings guidance that is lower quality (i.e., it is less accurate). This result varies predictably based on managers’ incentives, features of the firm’s analyst coverage, and the presence of other intermediaries. Overall, my findings identify a situation in which guidance quantity and quality move in divergent directions and highlight that analysts can be an important determinant of voluntary disclosure quality. JEL Classifications: G10; G17.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 100(6)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.