Optimal subsidy design for sports tourism under demand uncertainty: A multi-agent strategic interaction framework

This study develops a dynamic game model to analyze subsidy mechanisms for sports tourism integrated destination (STID), examining interactions between a core operator (major projects) and multiple supporting operators (ancillary services). It compares three scenarios: no subsidy, investment-based subsidies (core operator only), and visitor-driven subsidies (tied to tourist numbers). Results show investment-based subsidies increase core operator spending but not supporting operators' investments, while boosting tourist numbers and supporting operators' profits. Visitor-driven subsidies benefit all operators, increasing investments, profits and tourist volumes. When subsidy budgets are equal, visitor-driven subsidies yield better outcomes across all metrics if demand fluctuations remain stable. Demand shocks amplify both subsidy types' effectiveness. Findings suggest visitor-driven subsidies better coordinate tourism ecosystems, with demand volatility enhancing subsidy impacts, while core and supporting operators require differentiated policy approaches due to asymmetric responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329682
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal subsidy design for sports tourism under demand uncertainty: A multi-agent strategic interaction framework

Yuanyuan Yin
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
4.20
article

Optimal subsidy design for sports tourism under demand uncertainty: A multi-agent strategic interaction framework

Yuanyuan Yin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study develops a dynamic game model to analyze subsidy mechanisms for sports tourism integrated destination (STID), examining interactions between a core operator (major projects) and multiple supporting operators (ancillary services). It compares three scenarios: no subsidy, investment-based subsidies (core operator only), and visitor-driven subsidies (tied to tourist numbers). Results show investment-based subsidies increase core operator spending but not supporting operators' investments, while boosting tourist numbers and supporting operators' profits. Visitor-driven subsidies benefit all operators, increasing investments, profits and tourist volumes. When subsidy budgets are equal, visitor-driven subsidies yield better outcomes across all metrics if demand fluctuations remain stable. Demand shocks amplify both subsidy types' effectiveness. Findings suggest visitor-driven subsidies better coordinate tourism ecosystems, with demand volatility enhancing subsidy impacts, while core and supporting operators require differentiated policy approaches due to asymmetric responses.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
University of South China (CN)
Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal subsidy design for sports tourism under demand uncertainty: A multi-agent strategic interaction framework — Yuanyuan Yin · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS