Comparative Investigation of COD and Color Removal From Real Textile Wastewater by Electro‐Fenton and Photo‐Electro‐Fenton Methods: The Effect of Operational Parameters and Cost Analysis

With the rapid growth and development of the textile industry in the world, textile wastewater production has also increased in parallel to this. In this study, the effects of pH (2.0–4.5), current density (10–60 A/m 2 ), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) concentrations (250–2000 mg/L) on COD and color removal from textile wastewater by electro‐Fenton (EF) and photo‐electro‐Fenton (PEF) methods were comparatively investigated. Under the optimum conditions for the EF method (pH: 2.0, current density: 30 A/m 2 , H 2 O 2 : 1500 mg/L, interelectrode distance: 1.5 cm, stirring speed: 250 rpm, experimental time: 30 min), 84.13% COD and 79.49% color removal were obtained. For the PEF method, under optimum conditions (pH: 2.0, current density: 20 A/m 2 , H 2 O 2 : 1000 mg/L, UV lamp: 16 W, distance between electrodes: 1.5 cm, stirring speed: 250 rpm, experimental time 60 min), 92.06% COD and 84.62% color removal were obtained. The total treatment costs for the EF and PEF methods were calculated as 13.116 $/m 3 and 9.122 $/m 3 of wastewater, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijce/9248366
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Investigation of COD and Color Removal From Real Textile Wastewater by Electro‐Fenton and Photo‐Electro‐Fenton Methods: The Effect of Operational Parameters and Cost Analysis

Kasım Atmaca
1 citations
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Advanced oxidation water treatment
0.82
article

Comparative Investigation of COD and Color Removal From Real Textile Wastewater by Electro‐Fenton and Photo‐Electro‐Fenton Methods: The Effect of Operational Parameters and Cost Analysis

Kasım Atmaca
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the rapid growth and development of the textile industry in the world, textile wastewater production has also increased in parallel to this. In this study, the effects of pH (2.0–4.5), current density (10–60 A/m 2 ), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) concentrations (250–2000 mg/L) on COD and color removal from textile wastewater by electro‐Fenton (EF) and photo‐electro‐Fenton (PEF) methods were comparatively investigated. Under the optimum conditions for the EF method (pH: 2.0, current density: 30 A/m 2 , H 2 O 2 : 1500 mg/L, interelectrode distance: 1.5 cm, stirring speed: 250 rpm, experimental time: 30 min), 84.13% COD and 79.49% color removal were obtained. For the PEF method, under optimum conditions (pH: 2.0, current density: 20 A/m 2 , H 2 O 2 : 1000 mg/L, UV lamp: 16 W, distance between electrodes: 1.5 cm, stirring speed: 250 rpm, experimental time 60 min), 92.06% COD and 84.62% color removal were obtained. The total treatment costs for the EF and PEF methods were calculated as 13.116 $/m 3 and 9.122 $/m 3 of wastewater, respectively.

International Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 2025(1)
Sinop University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Investigation of COD and Color Removal From Real Textile Wastewater by Electro‐Fenton and Photo‐Electro‐Fenton Methods: The Effect of Operational Parameters and Cost Analysis — Kasım Atmaca · International Journal of Chemical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS