Reading Ubuntu relationality through a Levinasian lens

Ubuntu philosophy is a moral framework rooted in African traditions, emphasising interconnectedness, community, and a shared humanity that is based on a relational conceptualisation of the subject. In this article, I argue that Levinas’s radically passive ethical agent that operates through affective relationality rather than reason may be employed as instructive lens to lay bare the metaphysical dynamics at play in Ubuntu relationality – something which existing Ubuntu scholarship fails to do. While Ntibagirirwa (2018) argues in favour of conceiving of Ubuntu as a metaphysical concept he does not elucidate how exactly relationality may be accounted for. In other words, he fails to explain how and on what basis the metaphysical interconnectedness of the Self and the Other can be realised in the ethical obligation of altruism, which Ubuntu insists upon. A Levinasian reading of Ubuntu, I argue, finds its justification in their common contention that the humanness of the human being can only be verified in moral acts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Academica Critical views on society culture and politics
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v57i1.9072
Citations
1
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading Ubuntu relationality through a Levinasian lens

Benda Hofmeyr
1 citations
Acta Academica Critical views on society culture and politics
African cultural and philosophical studies
8.93
article

Reading Ubuntu relationality through a Levinasian lens

Benda Hofmeyr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ubuntu philosophy is a moral framework rooted in African traditions, emphasising interconnectedness, community, and a shared humanity that is based on a relational conceptualisation of the subject. In this article, I argue that Levinas’s radically passive ethical agent that operates through affective relationality rather than reason may be employed as instructive lens to lay bare the metaphysical dynamics at play in Ubuntu relationality – something which existing Ubuntu scholarship fails to do. While Ntibagirirwa (2018) argues in favour of conceiving of Ubuntu as a metaphysical concept he does not elucidate how exactly relationality may be accounted for. In other words, he fails to explain how and on what basis the metaphysical interconnectedness of the Self and the Other can be realised in the ethical obligation of altruism, which Ubuntu insists upon. A Levinasian reading of Ubuntu, I argue, finds its justification in their common contention that the humanness of the human being can only be verified in moral acts.

Acta Academica Critical views on society culture and politicsVol. 57(1)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
African cultural and philosophical studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading Ubuntu relationality through a Levinasian lens — Benda Hofmeyr · Acta Academica Critical views on society culture and politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS