Development of Diagnostic Instruments for Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI)

This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a diagnostic instrument for assessing students' critical thinking skills on socio-scientific issues (SSI) in physics education with the topic of global warming. This objective is motivated by the lack of valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate assessment instruments based on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) in physics education at the secondary school level, amid the low critical thinking competencies of Indonesian students as indicated by the 2018 PISA survey, and the need for an SSI approach as an effective strategy. The research method employs a research and development (R&D) design using the ADDIE model. The instrument was developed in the form of 20 essay questions based on SSI contexts and its validity was reviewed by experts and tested on 75 students from two high schools in rural and urban areas. Data were analyzed using Rasch modeling with the assistance of WINSTEPS software. Expert validation results showed that the instrument was categorized as “Highly Suitable.” Rasch model analysis confirmed the instrument's unidimensionality (raw variance explained by observed measures: 30.9%). The analysis results showed that all items were deemed fit (Outfit MNSQ: 0.78–1.28; ZSTD:–1.51 to 1.81; and PTMEA Corr: 0.26–0.68). The instrument's reliability is high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81, person reliability of 0.80, and item reliability of 0.91, using a structurally valid rating scale. However, significant DIF based on gender and region was found, indicating the need for further revision to ensure measurement fairness. This instrument is deemed valid and reliable for use as a diagnostic tool for critical thinking skills in SSI-based physics learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Corner of Education Linguistics and Literature
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i1.534
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Diagnostic Instruments for Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI)

Dewi Tri Wulandari, Hendri Noperi, Rahma Diani
2 citations
Journal Corner of Education Linguistics and Literature
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
article

Development of Diagnostic Instruments for Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI)

Dewi Tri Wulandari, Hendri Noperi, Rahma Diani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a diagnostic instrument for assessing students' critical thinking skills on socio-scientific issues (SSI) in physics education with the topic of global warming. This objective is motivated by the lack of valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate assessment instruments based on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) in physics education at the secondary school level, amid the low critical thinking competencies of Indonesian students as indicated by the 2018 PISA survey, and the need for an SSI approach as an effective strategy. The research method employs a research and development (R&D) design using the ADDIE model. The instrument was developed in the form of 20 essay questions based on SSI contexts and its validity was reviewed by experts and tested on 75 students from two high schools in rural and urban areas. Data were analyzed using Rasch modeling with the assistance of WINSTEPS software. Expert validation results showed that the instrument was categorized as “Highly Suitable.” Rasch model analysis confirmed the instrument's unidimensionality (raw variance explained by observed measures: 30.9%). The analysis results showed that all items were deemed fit (Outfit MNSQ: 0.78–1.28; ZSTD:–1.51 to 1.81; and PTMEA Corr: 0.26–0.68). The instrument's reliability is high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81, person reliability of 0.80, and item reliability of 0.91, using a structurally valid rating scale. However, significant DIF based on gender and region was found, indicating the need for further revision to ensure measurement fairness. This instrument is deemed valid and reliable for use as a diagnostic tool for critical thinking skills in SSI-based physics learning.

Journal Corner of Education Linguistics and LiteratureVol. 5(1)
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.