Designing Support for Systematic Sociotechnical Risk Literacy

Risk literacy in technology contexts concerns the ability to understand, assess, and make informed decisions about risks and their implications.This requires understanding the landscape of sociotechnical harms, as well as cultivating skills for identifying social and technical sources of harms, interpreting probabilistic information, understanding uncertainty, evaluating risk-benefit tradeoffs, and making decisions with incomplete information.Despite efforts to educate diverse audiences on technological risks and harms, these efforts are often ad-hoc and issue-driven.To move beyond issue-based approaches, we need a systematic approach to understanding technology's role in harm and assessing risk across sociotechnical contexts -what we term "systematic sociotechnical risk literacy".In this workshop, we will experiment with existing harms frameworks to develop a toolkit for teaching systematic risks across different contexts.This will equip educators to teach digital safety and foster coherence through shared language and practices.Ultimately, systematic digital risk literacy will enable engineers, policymakers, and researchers to collaboratively shape computing's future and navigate future uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3737609.3747101
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Support for Systematic Sociotechnical Risk Literacy

Andy Elliot Ricci, Mark Díaz, Ashley Marie Walker, Emily Tseng et al.
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Designing Support for Systematic Sociotechnical Risk Literacy

Andy Elliot Ricci, Mark Díaz, Ashley Marie Walker, Emily Tseng, Renee Shelby, Angela D. R. Smith, Ari Schlesinger
article en

Abstract

Risk literacy in technology contexts concerns the ability to understand, assess, and make informed decisions about risks and their implications.This requires understanding the landscape of sociotechnical harms, as well as cultivating skills for identifying social and technical sources of harms, interpreting probabilistic information, understanding uncertainty, evaluating risk-benefit tradeoffs, and making decisions with incomplete information.Despite efforts to educate diverse audiences on technological risks and harms, these efforts are often ad-hoc and issue-driven.To move beyond issue-based approaches, we need a systematic approach to understanding technology's role in harm and assessing risk across sociotechnical contexts -what we term "systematic sociotechnical risk literacy".In this workshop, we will experiment with existing harms frameworks to develop a toolkit for teaching systematic risks across different contexts.This will equip educators to teach digital safety and foster coherence through shared language and practices.Ultimately, systematic digital risk literacy will enable engineers, policymakers, and researchers to collaboratively shape computing's future and navigate future uncertainties.

Microsoft (United States) (US), Google (United States) (US), University of Georgia (US), Bates College (US), Microsoft Research New York City (United States), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.